Analysis - Snow Today
  • Snow

Widespread snow, limited water

February 2025 snow summary

  • Snow-covered area across the western United States was 87 percent of average for February, ranking sixteenth in the 25-year satellite record. On February 18, snow-covered area reached its maximum for the season.
  • Snow cover duration was just above the twenty-fifth percentile of the 25-year satellite record.
  • Snow albedo, also known as snow brightness, was low in early February. By mid-month, snowstorms increased the brightness, only to rapidly decrease to a seasonal low at month's end.
  • Snow water equivalent (SWE) was below average for 76 percent of stations at the beginning of the month and 59 percent at the end of the month.
  • Nearly all SWE stations across the western United States reported gains in February, except for a few low-elevation stations primarily in the deserts of the Southwest. 

Overview of conditions

Snow-covered area in February across the western United States was 13 percent below average, at 822,000 square kilometers (317,000 square miles) of snow cover, ranking sixteenth highest in the 25-year satellite record (Table 1). Snow-covered area for February was about half of the area of the record high year, 2023, and 264,000 square kilometers (102,000 square miles) more than February 2003, the lowest year on record.

Table 1. February 2025 Snow Cover in the Western United States (Relative to the 25-Year Satellite Record)

Snow-Covered Area 

Square Kilometers 

Square Miles 

Rank 

February 2025

822,000

317,000

16

2001 to 2024, Average 

940,000 

363,000 

-- 

2023, Highest 

1,622,000 

626,000

2003, Lowest 

558,000

215,000

25 

2024, Last year

734,000

283,000

19 

Based on the 25-year satellite record, maximum snow cover occurred on February 18, 31 days later than average and six days earlier than 2018, the year with the latest date of maximum snow cover on record (Figure 1).  

 

Maximum snow cover dates plot
Figure 1. This graph shows the recorded dates for maximum snow cover over the western United States in the 25-year satellite record. The dashed line indicates the average maximum snow coverage date of January 17. The red dot depicts February 18, the date of maximum snow-covered area in 2025. — Credit: Ross Palomaki, Karl Rittger, Sebastien Lenard, Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research and Mark Raleigh, Oregon State University

Snow cover extent was mixed across the region in February (Figure 2). Snow cover was far below average in the Southwest, at 18 percent of average in New Mexico and 8 percent of average in Arizona. This pattern extended into the deserts in southern Utah (60 percent of average) and Colorado (76 percent of average), contributing to below-average snow cover in those states. Conditions were closer to average for this time of year in California (88 percent of average) and Wyoming (98 percent of average). Further north, widespread snow cover from coastal regions through the Northern Great Plains resulted in above-average snow cover in Washington (154 percent of average), Oregon (162 percent of average), Idaho (109 percent of average), Montana (189 percent of average), and South Dakota (112 percent of average). These geographic patterns are also apparent in major river basins, with far below-average snow cover in the Rio Grande (37 percent of average) and Lower Colorado (10 percent of average) basins and above-average conditions in the Missouri (135 percent of average) and Pacific Northwest (130 percent of average) basins.  

Snow cover percentage in states and water basins
Figure 2. The left bar graph shows the percent-of-average snow-covered area in February 2025 in the western United States, while the graph on the right depicts the percent-of-average snow-covered area in hydrologic unit code 2 (HUC2) basins for the same month. — Credit: Ross Palomaki, Karl Rittger, Sebastien Lenard, Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research

Conditions in context: Snow cover

Snow-covered area in February was below average but above the lower twenty-fifth percentile (Figure 3, upper left). During February, snowstorms greatly increased snow-covered area to above the upper seventy-fifth percentile of the 25-year satellite record. Snow-covered area decreased rapidly in late February, ending below the twenty-fifth percentile. In southern regions, snow-covered areas at low and mid-elevations were 40 to 80 percent below average with higher elevations having 1 to 40 percent below-average snow cover (Figure 3, upper right). In northern regions, lower to mid-elevations had 20 to 100 percent above-average snow cover while high elevations had 1 to 20 percent above-average snow cover. 

Snow-covered area and snow cover duration depicted as a graph and map
Figure 3. The upper left graph shows the total snow-covered area over the western United States in relation to the 25-year satellite record. The upper right map shows the departure from average snow cover percent for February 2025. Warm colors indicate below-average snow cover; cool colors indicate above-average snow cover. The lower left graph shows snow cover duration measured in days over the western United States in relation to the 25-year satellite record. The lower right map shows the departure from average snow cover duration where the average is summed from October 1, 2024, to February 28, 2025. Warm colors indicate below-average snow cover duration; cool colors indicate above-average snow cover duration. — Credit: Karl Rittger and Sebastien Lenard, Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research

Averaged over the western United States, the snow cover duration measured in days summed from October 1 to February 28 has continued to increase (Figure 3, lower left). Typically, in October through January in any given year the minimum snow cover duration and the twenty-fifth percentile have similar trajectories. By contrast, in February, the two begin to move apart. This year, February snow cover duration was near the twenty-fifth percentile with the most recent storms in February pushing snow cover days slightly above the twenty-fifth percentile. Despite the previously-discussed high snow cover percent for February in the northern regions (Figure 3, upper right), snow cover duration was slightly below average (-1 to -40 percent) in the majority of areas (Figure 3, lower right). February snowstorms accumulated snow cover at low elevations that was short lived because of warm conditions. The southern regions had below average snow cover duration in nearly all locations except the Front Range in Colorado, which had up to 60 days more snow cover, while high elevation ranges had up to 40 days more snow cover. 

Average snow brightness, known as snow albedo, was five percent below average at the beginning of the month (Figure 4, left). Snowstorms temporarily brightened the snow albedo to above average before rapidly decreasing in late February. There were also a few days when many low elevation areas were blanketed with bright snow that have been historically snow free. This led to vast regions of above average snow on the spatial maps (Figure 4, right). However, this low-elevation snow did not linger long enough to darken. By the end of February, average snow-covered area was just below the twenty-fifth percentile (Figure 3, upper left). 

average snow albedo and departure from average as graph and map
Figure 4. The graph on the left shows the average snow albedo over the western United States in relation to the 25-year-satellite record. The map on the right shows the departure from average snow albedo for February 2025.  — Credit: Karl Rittger and Sebastien Lenard, Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research

Conditions in context: Snow water equivalent (SWE) 

At the beginning of February, 76 percent of stations reported below-average snow water equivalent (SWE) (Figure 5). Extremely dry conditions were present in Arizona (17 of 20 stations reporting 0 SWE) and New Mexico (10 of 28 stations reporting 0 SWE), as well as across southern Colorado and southwestern Utah. Exceptions to these widespread below-average conditions included the Front Range in Colorado, the Bighorn Mountains in Wyoming, the Boise Mountains in Idaho, and much of Oregon. 

By the end of the month, only 59 percent of stations reported below-average SWE. SWE stations that shifted from below-average to near- or above-average are distributed throughout the Wasatch and Uinta Ranges in northern Utah, the Sierra Nevada Range in California, and the Greater Yellowstone Ecoregion across Wyoming, Montana, and Idaho. Mountain regions in the desert southwest (Arizona, New Mexico, southern Utah, and southern Colorado) and northern Washington saw little snow accumulation throughout February, and SWE deficits were largely maintained in these regions. At the end of February, 13 stations in Arizona and 13 stations in New Mexico reported 0 SWE. 

snow water equivalent (SWE) at monitoring sites at the start and end of February
Figure 5. The left map shows snow water equivalent (SWE) at monitoring sites at the beginning of February; the map on the rights shows SWE at the end of the month. SWE is expressed as a percent of average at each site, with warmer colors indicating below average SWE, or less water in the form of snow, and cooler colors indicating above average SWE, or more water; white areas indicate average SWE. For stations where the long-term average SWE is zero but the current date shows SWE above zero, the station is plotted with the darkest blue color. The green shading delineates mountainous areas as represented in Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) data. — Credit: Ross Palomaki, Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, M. Raleigh, Oregon State University

Although SWE at the end of February was still below average at more than half of stations, nearly all stations recorded SWE gains during February (Figure 6). Atmospheric river events brought substantial precipitation to California, Washington, and Idaho. At some stations SWE gains of more than 50 centimeters were recorded. With assumed snow density of 15 percent, this represents more than 10 feet of snowfall during February at those stations. SWE losses were confined to low elevation stations, primarily in the desert southwest region.  

net change in snow water equivalent shown in map and plot
Figure 6. The left map shows the net change in snow water equivalent (SWE) in centimeters during February 2025 with blue indicating a net SWE gain (more snowfall than snowmelt) and red indicating a net SWE loss (more snowmelt than snowfall). Note that the color bar at the bottom of the map is not linear and exhibits different increments across the warm and cool colors to best represent the values in the map. The green shading delineates mountainous areas as represented in Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) data. The right chart shows the monthly SWE changes recorded at the stations (circles) in each state with state averages (diamonds). Notably, the monitoring station averages are not necessarily indicative of the true state averages because the stations are not distributed evenly in space or elevation. — Credit: Ross Palomaki, Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, Mark Raleigh, Oregon State University