Analysis - Ice Sheets Today
  • Ice shelves

The Great Un-Freezing: Record Antarctic surface melt extent set; Peninsula melting slows

Surface melting for the Antarctic ice sheet appears to have set a record for the 46-year satellite observation period on January 2, 2025. All areas of the Antarctic coast that generally see significant summertime melting continue to accumulate melt days at a faster-than-average pace, except along the northern West Antarctic ice shelves, which are now near-average.

Current conditions

Days after our last report, surface melting exceeded the all-time record set just a week earlier in December with an even greater melt extent on January 2, 2025, with 3.7 percent of the Antarctic ice sheet showing melt that day, and 49 percent of the Antarctic Peninsula sub-region experiencing melt (as determined by our satellite passive microwave method). Melting continued to occur most days in January in the western Larsen C, Amery, and Totten Ice Shelves, although the overall area of daily melt extent for the ice sheet dropped through the course of the month. This was especially true in the Peninsula, which showed near-zero surface melting on January 19. Widespread melting along the Dronning Maud Land coast and Amery Ice Shelf on January 17 and 18 led to a second melt extent daily record for the continent.

Figure 1. The top left map shows the total melt days for the Antarctic Ice Sheet from November 1, 2024, to January 20, 2025 with a close-up map of the Antarctic Peninsula to its right. The bottom left and center maps show the total melt days as a difference from average relative to the 1991 to 2020 reference period. The top right graph shows daily melt extent as a percentage of the ice sheet for the 2024 melt season up to January 20, 2025, with the average values and ranges for the same reference period. Th
Figure 1. The top left map shows the total melt days for the Antarctic Ice Sheet from November 1, 2024, to January 20, 2025 with a close-up map of the Antarctic Peninsula to its right. The bottom left and center maps show the total melt days as a difference from average relative to the 1991 to 2020 reference period. The top right graph shows daily melt extent as a percentage of the ice sheet for the 2024 melt season up to January 20, 2025, with the average values and ranges for the same reference period. The bottom right graph shows the same melt extent for the Antarctic Peninsula sub-region. The black outline on the corresponding Antarctic Peninsula map shows the grid cells included in the Peninsula measurements. — Credit: National Snow and Ice Data Center

Conditions in context

The persistently high melt extents for much of December and January this season are due to widespread above-average air temperatures across the continent. However, warmth over the Peninsula has been less extreme and air temperatures have been near-average over portions of the Wilkes Land coast. Air circulation patterns explain some of the warmest regions (e.g., to the southeast of low-pressure areas, or southwest of high-pressure regions), but in general are atypical of the continent. 

Figure 2. The map on the left shows surface air temperature difference from average for January 1 to January 20, 2024, for Antarctica. The map on the right shows difference from average air pressure for the same period.
Figure 2. The map on the left shows surface air temperature difference from average for January 1 to January 20, 2024, for Antarctica. The map on the right shows difference from average air pressure for the same period. — Credit: NSIDC courtesy NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory Physical Sciences Laboratory

Extensive melt ponds and streams form on the Amery for the first time in five years

Warm and frequently sunny conditions led to extensive surface melting and ponding on the Amery Ice Shelf. As melting progressed into January, several areas formed streams, where meltwater saturated the underlying snow and firn and moved downstream (generally northward) until they reached less saturated snow and soaked into the sub-surface firn.

Figure 3. These two NASA Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer images of the Amery Ice Shelf show the development of melt ponds and melt streams between December 18, 2024, and January 24, 2025. Images are 400 kilometers by 250 kilometers (249 miles by 155 miles), and north is to the upper right. The melt stream circled in blue continued to extend, growing by 14 kilometers (about 9 miles) between January 21 and 28, 2025.
Figure 3. These two NASA Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer images of the Amery Ice Shelf show the development of melt ponds and melt streams between December 18, 2024, and January 24, 2025. Images are 400 kilometers by 250 kilometers (249 miles by 155 miles), and north is to the upper right. The melt stream circled in blue continued to extend, growing by 14 kilometers (about 9 miles) between January 21 and 28, 2025. — Credit: NASA Worldview

Timing is everything for mapping melt

Comparisons of the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) melt algorithm with other algorithms can show significant differences in overall extent, although the relative extent variations, such as timing of seasonal highs and lows, tend to broadly agree. The differences are likely related to the timing of the passive microwave satellite passes used to determine melt extent in the NSIDC approach.

As an illustration of how important satellite overpass timing can be, relative to local time on the surface, the climate model Modèle Atmosphérique Régional (MAR) version 3.12 was used to calculate hourly melt extent over the month of January, from January 1 to January 21, 2025. Hourly surface melt extent over the continent is strongly controlled by insolation, or incoming solar radiation, which varies with the height of the sun even in the eternal daylight of the Antarctic coast. The model determines the hourly surface melt extent by using a calculated production of 1/24 of a millimeter per hour, equivalent to 0.042 millimeters or about 0.002 inches. Thus, the difference in measured melt extent from passive microwave satellite data can vary greatly if the overpasses occur in local morning, afternoon, or late evening. Moreover, the estimated physical threshold for detecting water in the passive microwave satellite algorithm is different from the climate model threshold.

Figure 4. In this plot, climate model results show a variety of determinations of melt extent as percent melting of the ice sheet of Antarctica. Hourly melt extent, shown in red, is mapped with a threshold of at least 1/24 of a millimeter generated per hour. This varies strongly each day and is driven by the large area of melt occurring on the Peninsula each day, peaking late in the day Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). Model results for integrated melt over a day ( greater than 1 millimeter of water melt p
Figure 4. In this plot, climate model results show a variety of determinations of melt extent as percent melting of the ice sheet of Antarctica. Hourly melt extent, shown in red, is mapped with a threshold of at least 1/24 of a millimeter generated per hour. This varies strongly each day and is driven by the large area of melt occurring on the Peninsula each day, peaking late in the day Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). Model results for integrated melt over a day ( greater than 1 millimeter of water melt per day) show less day-to-day variation and greater overall extent. Similarly, model results for extent of the ice sheet with at least 0.1 percent of melt in the uppermost meter of snow show little day-to-day variation. The National Snow and Ice Data Center satellite melt algorithm is strongly affected by local daily cycle. — Credit: Xavier Fettweis, University of Liège, Belgium