Analysis - Snow Today
  • Snow

May-be too late for snow

May 2025 snow summary  

  • Snow-covered area across the western United States was 109 percent of average for May, ranking twelfth in the 25-year satellite record.
  • Snow cover duration remained near the twenty-fifth percentile of the 25-year satellite record throughout the month. 
  • Snow albedo, also known as snow brightness, started near average in early May and then rapidly decreased until storms in the third week of the month brought it to near average.
  • Snow water equivalent (SWE) conditions relative to average significantly decreased during the month, with almost all stations recording large negative changes during the month.

Overview of conditions 

Snow-covered area in May across the western United States was 9 percent above average, at 105,000 square kilometers (41,000 square miles) of snow cover, ranking twelfth in the 25-year satellite record (Table 1). Snow-covered area for May was 67,000 square kilometers (25,000 square miles) below 2011, the highest year, and 53,000 square kilometers (21,000 square miles) above 2015, the lowest May on record.   

Table 1. May 2025 Snow Cover in the Western United States (Relative to the 25-Year Satellite Record)  

Snow-Covered AreaSquare KilometersSquare MilesRank
May 2025105,00041,00012
2001 to 2024, Average96,00037,000--
2011, Highest172,00066,0001
2015, Lowest52,00020,00025
2024, Last year108,00042,00011

Although snow cover was slightly above average in most western states during May (Figure 1), some states showed below average or zero snow cover. In the Southwest, snow cover was below average in New Mexico (56 percent of average) with no snow present in Arizona during May. South Dakota also had zero snow cover. Despite below average snow cover in the Southwest and Great Plains, close to or above average snow cover was observed in all other western states. Snow cover in Colorado was very close to average (99 percent of average) and above average in California (122 percent of average), Nevada (139 percent of average), Utah (107 percent of average), Wyoming (115 percent of average), and Montana (155 percent of average). As in April, the Pacific Northwest states of Oregon (159 percent of average), Washington (110 percent of average), and Idaho (140 percent of average) all showed above average snow cover. 

These geographic patterns were also apparent in major river basins, with zero observed snow cover in the Lower Colorado basin (covering most of Arizona) and 70 percent of average snow cover in the Rio Grande basin (covering southern Colorado and much of New Mexico). In April, the Pacific Northwest was the only hydrologic unit code 2 (HUC2) basin with above average snow cover. By contrast, in May, all HUC2 basins other than those in the southwest showed above average or close to average snow cover. Like in April, the highest above average snow cover was observed in the Pacific Northwest basin (140 percent of average), followed by the Missouri (134 percent of average), California (127 percent of average), and Great Basin (118 percent of average) basins. Snow cover was near average in the Upper Colorado (98 percent of average) and Arkansas-White-Red basins (96 percent of average).   

percent-of-average snow-covered area in May 2025 in the western United States
Figure 1. The left bar graph shows the percent-of-average snow-covered area in May 2025 in the western United States, while the graph on the right depicts the percent-of-average snow-covered area in hydrologic unit code 2 (HUC2) basins for the same month. — Credit: Ross Palomaki, Karl Rittger, Sebastien Lenard, Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research

Conditions in context: Snow cover  

Snow-covered area in May was near average (Figure 2, upper left). Snow cover in the first two weeks of May was very close to the median of the 25-year satellite record, but storms in the third week brought snow-covered area up to near the seventh-fifth percentile. Snow-covered area then decreased while remaining above average until the last two days of the month when snow cover dipped below average. Large areas of Oregon, Washington, Idaho and Montana had 20 to 40 percent above-average snow cover (Figure 2, upper right). California, Utah, Colorado, and Wyoming had below-average snow cover at higher elevations with above-average snow cover observed at lower elevations, particularly in Wyoming. In Nevada, Arizona, and New Mexico, very little snow cover was observed, but conditions were close to average due to low snow cover in these states in May in the historical record.  

total snow-covered area over the western United States in relation to the 25-year satellite data
Figure 2. The upper left graph shows the total snow-covered area over the western United States in relation to the 25-year satellite data. The upper right map shows the differences between the snow cover percent representing an average year and the snow cover percent recorded in May 2025. Warm colors indicate below-average snow cover, cool colors indicate above-average snow cover, and white areas indicate minor variation from the average. The lower left graph shows snow cover duration measured in days over the western United States in relation to the 25-year satellite data. The lower right map shows the difference between the snow cover duration of an average year and this year, summed from October 1, 2024, to May 31, 2025. Warm colors indicate below-average snow cover duration, cool colors indicate above-average, and white areas indicate little to no change. — Credit: Karl Rittger and Sebastien Lenard, Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research

Snow cover duration measured in days summed from October 1 to May 31 continued to increase (Figure 2, lower left). Similar to April, snow cover duration during May remained near the twenty-fifth percentile. In Nevada, Utah, Arizona, and New Mexico, snow cover duration was up to 100 days below average in large areas (Figure 2, lower right). Most of Wyoming also had 20 to 40 fewer snow-covered days than average. The remaining western states showed a mix of below and above average snow-covered days, with Colorado in particular showing well below average conditions in the southern part of the state and well above average snow-covered days in the eastern plains.  

Average snow brightness, known as snow albedo, was close to average at the beginning of May, but steeply decreased during the first two weeks of the month, dropping below the twenty-fifth percentile by May 11th (Figure 3, left). Storms during the third week of May led to an increase in albedo, but albedo then declined for the remainder of the month with values below the twenty-fifth percentile during the final week of May. Albedo varied by state with most snow-covered areas falling near the average. However, below average albedo was observed in high elevation regions of Wyoming while albedo was generally above average in the mountainous regions of Colorado and Utah.  

Snow albedo over western United States in May 2025
Figure 3. The graph on the left shows the average snow albedo over the western United States in relation to the 25-year-satellite record. The map on the right shows the differences between the snow albedo for an average year and the snow albedo observed in May 2025.  — Credit: Karl Rittger and Sebastien Lenard, Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research

Conditions in context: Snow water equivalent (SWE)  

Snow water equivalent (SWE) at the beginning of May was mixed with a range of average, below-average, and above-average SWE (Figure 4). Extremely low SWE was recorded across Utah, Colorado, New Mexico, and Arizona. Only 3 stations in New Mexico recorded SWE at the beginning of the month and zero did in Arizona. SWE was also below average in the Washington Cascades. Across the remaining western US states, SWE was mixed with both below and above average measurements recorded in California, Oregon, Nevada, Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming.  

SWE declined rapidly throughout May in all states. Because of above-average temperatures in early May, stations in Nevada, Colorado, Utah, and New Mexico saw record early melt out. By the end of the month, most stations in California and Oregon also recorded zero SWE. Some stations in Washington, Wyoming, and Colorado did record above-average SWE at the end of May, but most measurements were well below average.  

Snow water equivalent for beginning and end of May
Figure 4. The left map shows snow water equivalent (SWE) at monitoring sites at the start of May, and the right map shows SWE at the end of May. SWE is expressed as percent of average conditions at each site, with warmer colors indicating below average SWE, or less water in the form of snow, cooler colors indicating above average SWE, or more water, and white areas indicating average SWE. For stations where the long-term average SWE is zero, but the current date shows SWE above zero, the station is plotted with the darkest blue color. The green shading delineates mountainous areas as represented in Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) data.  — Credit: Ross Palomaki, Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, M. Raleigh, Oregon State University

All stations in the West recorded SWE decreases in May, except for a small number in the Sangre de Cristo mountains of Colorado and New Mexico (Figure 5, left). Average change in SWE was also negative across all states, except those with low or zero SWE at the beginning of the month (Arizona, New Mexico, and South Dakota). Some stations in California and Idaho recorded SWE decreases of more than 100 centimeters (40 inches). 

net change in snow water equivalent (SWE) in centimeters that occurred during May 2025
Figure 5. The left map shows the net change in snow water equivalent (SWE) in centimeters that occurred during May 2025 with blue indicating a net SWE gain (more snowfall than snowmelt) and red indicating a net SWE loss (more snowmelt than snowfall). Note that the color bar at the bottom of the left-side map is not linear and exhibits different increments across the warm and cool colors to represent the values best visually on the map. The green shading delineates mountainous areas as represented in Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) data. The right chart shows the monthly SWE changes recorded at the stations (circles) in each state; the state averages (diamonds) are also shown. Notably, the monitoring station averages are not necessarily indicative of the true state averages because the stations are not distributed evenly in space or elevation.  — Credit: Ross Palomaki, Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, Mark Raleigh, Oregon State University