Data Set ID:
ILUTP2

IceBridge Riegl Laser Altimeter L2 Geolocated Surface Elevation Triplets, Version 1

This data set contains surface range values for Antarctica and Greenland derived from measurements captured by the Riegl Laser Altimeter. The data were collected by scientists working on the Investigating the Cryospheric Evolution of the Central Antarctic Plate (ICECAP) project, which is funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) with additional support from NASA Operation IceBridge.

This is the most recent version of these data.

Version Summary:

Initial release

BASIC Level of Service

Data: Data integrity verified

Documentation: Key metadata and links to supporting documentation available

User Support: Assistance with data access and basic data usage

See All Level of Service Details

Parameter(s):
  • TOPOGRAPHY > TERRAIN ELEVATION > Surface Range
Data Format(s):
  • ASCII Text
Spatial Coverage:
N: 90, 
N: -53, 
S: 60, 
S: -90, 
E: 180, 
E: 180, 
W: -180
W: -180
Platform(s):BT-67
Spatial Resolution:
  • Varies x Varies
Sensor(s):UTIG Riegl
Temporal Coverage:
  • 29 December 2008 to 22 January 2013
(updated 2013)
Version(s):V1
Temporal ResolutionVariesMetadata XML:View Metadata Record
Data Contributor(s):Donald Blankenship, Scott Kempf, Duncan Young

Geographic Coverage

Other Access Options

Other Access Options

Close

As a condition of using these data, you must cite the use of this data set using the following citation. For more information, see our Use and Copyright Web page.

Blankenship, D. D., S. D. Kempf, D. A. Young, J. L. Roberts, T. van Ommen, R. Forsberg, M. J. Siegert, S. J. Palmer, and J. A. Dowdeswell. 2012, updated 2013. IceBridge Riegl Laser Altimeter L2 Geolocated Surface Elevation Triplets, Version 1. [Indicate subset used]. Boulder, Colorado USA. NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center. doi: https://doi.org/10.5067/JV9DENETK13E. [Date Accessed].

Back to Top

Collapse All / Open All

Detailed Data Description

Format

The data files are in space-delimited ASCII text format. Each data file is paired with an associated XML file, which contains additional metadata.

Background color on
File Naming Convention

The data files are named according to the following convention and as described in Table 1:

File name examples: 
ILUTP2_2013022_ICP5_JKB2h_F26T04a_srfelv.txt
ILUTP2_2013022_ICP5_JKB2h_F26T04a_srfelv.txt.xml

ILUTP2_YYYYDOY_AAAN_JKBna_Xnna_srfelv.xxx

Table 1. File Naming Convention
Variable Description
ILUTP2 Data set ID
YYYY Four-digit year of survey
DOY Day of year of survey
AAAN Geographic area
JKBna Host platform
Xnna Geographic track line
srfelv Surface range
xxx Indicates ASCII text file (.txt), or or XML file (.xml)
Background color on
Spatial Coverage

Spatial coverage for the Riegl Laser Altimeter data includes Greenland and Antarctica. This represents the coverage noted below.

Greenland:
Southernmost Latitude 59° N
Northernmost Latitude: 83° N
Westernmost Longitude: 74° W
Easternmost Longitude: 12° W

Antarctica:
Southernmost Latitude: 90° S
Northernmost Latitude: 53° S
Westernmost Longitude: 180° W
Easternmost Longitude: 180° E

Figure one shows spatial coverages for Antarctica by campaign year.
Figure 1. Antarctic Temporal and Spatial Coverage

Spatial Resolution

The effective footprint of the laser data is 25 m along track by 1 meter across track.

Projection and Grid Description

Referenced to WGS-84 Ellipsoid, ITRF-2008.

Background color on
Temporal Coverage

29 December 2008 to 22 January 2013

Temporal Resolution

IceBridge campaigns are conducted on an annual repeating basis. Arctic and Greenland campaigns are typically conducted during March, April, and May; Antarctic campaigns are typically conducted between October and February.

Background color on
Parameter or Variable

Parameter Description

The Riegl Laser Altimeter L2 files contain fields as described in Table 2.

Table 2. Parameter Description
Parameter Units
Year UTC
Day of Year UTC
Second of day UTC
Longitude Angle, WGS-84 Degrees
Latitude Angle, WGS-84 Degrees
Laser Derived Surface Range (WGS-84, ITRF2005) Meters

Missing values have been replaced by NANs.

Horizontal positions represent aircraft location at the time of the observation.

Sample Data Record

Shown below are the first ten data records from the data file: ILUTP2_2013013_ICP5_JKB2h_F20T01a_srfelv.txt

Background color on

Software and Tools

No special tools are required for the ASCII text files.

Background color on

Data Acquisition and Processing

Data Acquisition Methods

The data were collected using a Riegl LD90-3800-HiP-LR combined with a range of GPS receivers and Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) systems, mounted in a DC-3T (Basler BT-67) survey aircraft. Typical survey heights were 800 m above the ice surface. Typical survey speeds were 90 m/s. Pointing biases were recovered from aircraft crossovers.

Positioning and orientation for Antarctica 2009 came from loosely coupled joint Precise Point Position (PPP)/inertial solutions using an OEM-4 GPS receiver and a Honeywell HG1700/AG58 IMU. In 2010/2011, positioning came from PPP solutions on a Javad GPS receiver, while orientation real time output from a Honeywell H-764 EGI (s/n #6038) provided by Danish Technical University as part of the IceGrav project. Positioning and orientation for Antarctica 2011 and 2012, and the 2011 Greenland field season came from loosely coupled joint PPP/inertial solutions using an OEM-4 GPS receiver and an iMAR FSAS IMU. Some flights during Greenland 2011 had corrupted IMU data, and thus are unavailable. See Young et al. (2014) for details of data acquisition and calibration, and see the granule metadata for specific combination used.

Background color on
Derivation Techniques and Algorithms

Trajectory and Attitude Data

Except for the 2010 field season, trajectory information was derived using Waypoint Inertial Explorer loosely coupled PPP/IMU processing. See the IceBridge GPS/IMU L1B Primary Position and Attitude Solution data set and Young et al. (2014) for details.

Processing Steps

Cloud filtering was performed by passing only continuous sections 20 meters long, with jumps between samples of 2 meters rejected. Ranges of less than 150 meters were also rejected. Default ranges where a surface was not detected by the laser ranger were -1 meters. Range vectors were transformed into elevations through the vector algebra reviewed in Koks (2008).

Version History

On 05 July 2013, the Version 1 2009, 2010, and 2011 Antarctica data were replaced by Version 1.1. Version 1.1 data files were revised in the Seconds field and the Laser Derived Surface field.

Error Sources

The primary sources of errors are:

  • the pointing biases, in particular a coupling between the pitch bias and the range bias
  • the limitation on the along track resolution, especially in rough areas
  • interflight biases due to unmodelled tropospheric delays in the PPP GPS solutions

The net error is approximately 12 cm.

Background color on
Sensor or Instrument Description

The instrument has been used and validated in previous field campaigns (Young et al., 2014). The instrument is a Riegl LD90-3800-HiP-LR distance meter, with a 3.5 mW diode laser operating at 905 nm. The Laser Altimeter System (LAS) acquires measurements at 2000 Hz, with a range resolution of 2 mm and ground spot width of approximately 1 m. For each block of 575 pulses, the greatest range is recorded, along with the standard deviation and maximum amplitude of the detected pulse echoes. Samples were time stamped using a 100 kHz counter timer, along with a precise timing signal from GPS clock. Typical point separation on the ground was 21–23 m, as expected for a target ground speed of 90 m-s-1. The maximum range of the system is 1500 m over ice.

Background color on

References and Related Publications

Contacts and Acknowledgments

Donald D. Blankenship, Duncan A. Young, and Scott D. Kemp
University of Texas at Austin
Institute for Geophysics
Austin, TX, 78759-8500

Jason L. Roberts and Tas van Ommen
Australian Antarctic Division
Kingston, Tasmania
and 
Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems CRC 
University of Tasmania
Hobart, Tasmania

Martin J. Siegert
Faculty of Natural Sciences
The Grantham Institute for Climate Change
Imperial College
London, UK

Rene Forsberg
National Space Institute
Danish Technical University
Copenhagen, Denmark

Steven J. Palmer
Department of Geography
University of Exeter
Exeter, UK

Julian A. Dowdeswell
Scott Polar Research Institute
University of Cambridge
Cambridge, UK

Acknowledgments: 

University of Texas Icebridge altimetry data was sponsored by grants NNX09AR52G, NNG10HP06C – ARRA, and NNX11AD33G. The altimetry acquisition piggybacked in Antarctica on ICECAP and GIMBLE (sponsored by NSF grants PLR-0733025 and PLR-1043761, UK NERC grant NE/D003733/1 to the University of Edinburgh, Australia's ACE-CRC, AAD project 3103 and 4077), and in Greenland on IPEV project DATACO, and GrOGG (sponsored by UK NERC grant NE/H020667 to the Scott Polar Research Institute). The Danish Technical University provided the Embedded GPS/INS (EGI) Intertial Navigation System (INS) used in the 2010-2011 field season. See Support: Funding: and Institutions: fields in granules for specific information for each file.

No technical references available for this data set.

How To

Programmatic Data Access Guide
Data from the NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center (NSIDC DAAC) can be accessed directly from our HTTPS file system or through our Application Programming Interface (API). Our API offers you the ability to order data using specific temporal and spatial filters... read more
Filter and order from a data set web page
Many NSIDC data set web pages provide the ability to search and filter data with spatial and temporal contstraints using a map-based interface. This article outlines how to order NSIDC DAAC data using advanced searching and filtering.  Step 1: Go to a data set web page This article will use the... read more