GLIMS Update: Global ASTER imaging reprioritization (fwd)
Bruce Raup
braup at nsidc.org
Tue Dec 6 08:46:40 MST 2005
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 12:18:30 +0100
From: Ian A. Brown <Ian.Brown at natgeo.su.se>
To: Jeffrey Kargel <jeffreyskargel at hotmail.com>,
owner-glims at flagmail.wr.usgs.gov
Subject: RE: GLIMS Update: Global ASTER imaging reprioritization
Dear All,
can I ask how many RCs, like ourselves in Scandinavia, have received very little
ASTER coverage? Many of us are relying on Landsat-7 because there haven't been
ASTER acquisitions over our region. It seems to me that there is a need to evaluate
GLIMS priorities and then assess the tasking needs. For example, I can understand
that in terms of climate change imaging Scandinavian glaciers may be relatively less
important than repeat coverage of Greenland glaciers allowing quantitative change
detection. However, if you want GLIMS to generate an ASTER derived baseline of
glacier parameters then gobal coverage should be prioritised ahead of repeat
acquisitions of regions already covered. Just a thought...
Regards,
Ian
Ian Brown
Inst. Naturgeografi och Kvart?rgeologi
(Dept. of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology)
Stockholm University
Sweden
More information about the GLIMS
mailing list