[GLIMS] GLIMS Update: (1) list of people, (2) ASTER data acquisitions
Silvia Delgado
sdelgado at mendoza-conicet.gob.ar
Mon Apr 7 08:38:48 MDT 2014
Our names are OK in the GLIMS list, but our server changed. We are
receiving emails at the address you have, but our new address are:
Silvia Delgado : sdelgado at mendoza-conicet.gob.ar
Mariano Masiokas : mmasiokas at mendoza-conicet.gob.ar
Thanks
Silvia Delgado
El 30/03/2014 18:50, Jeffrey escribió:
> Dear GLIMS colleagues,
>
> 1. We need to clean the GLIMS list of people
> (http://www.glims.org/glims/collaborators_people.php). The bottom of
> the table sums the entries as 270. This includes many duplicate
> names. The number of currently or recently active, listed
> participants is closer to 200 after accounting for duplicate names.
> The list also includes some long-ago or former wishful but
> unproductive contributors, but I am also sure there are many actual
> recent contributors who are not listed. I want to fix the list, so I
> seek your input on names of yourself or your unlisted colleagues who
> have contributed to the database, or behind the scenes to the glacier
> analysis, or to technology development that went straight into GLIMS
> analysis, or who contributed to the GLIMS book. I will make a list
> of people who I know or believe have not been active to a point of
> having contributed to the GLIMS database or the GLIMS book but who are
> nonetheless listed. If I am in doubt, I will email that person before
> striking them off the list. We might make a list of former major
> contributors who have retired or moved on to something else, but who
> should remain named in some capacity. For newly added names I need:
> Family name, given name, affiliation, geographic area(s) of interest,
> regional center if you know it, and contact email (your own email or
> a designated surrogate).
>
> 2. Some changes in the GLIMS acquisition parameters for ASTER were
> implemented a few months ago, so I ask Southern Hemisphere people to
> look at acquisitions in the last few months for southern targets. Let
> me know if things went well, or poorly (and whether due to few
> acquisitions; too much cloud cover; poor gains; artifacts; poor
> illumination; or too much snow cover), or so-so, and give numbers if
> possible, but at least a qualitative signal of whether things are
> working or not. I am particularly wondering about Antarctica
> (peninsula and "mainland"), but any southern glaciers are relevant at
> this time.
>
> --Jeff
>
>
> Jeffrey S. Kargel
> Department of Hydrology & Water Resources
> University of Arizona
> Tucson, AZ 85742 USA
> Email(1) jeffreyskargel at hotmail.com
> Email(2) kargel at hwr.arizona.edu
> Mobile phone: 520-780-7759
> www.glims.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GLIMS mailing list
> GLIMS at nsidc.org
> https://nsidc.org/mailman/listinfo/glims
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://nsidc.org/pipermail/glims/attachments/20140407/ed4b8b4f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: estado inventario_abril 2014.pptx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation
Size: 14311893 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://nsidc.org/pipermail/glims/attachments/20140407/ed4b8b4f/attachment.bin>
More information about the GLIMS
mailing list