FTP Data Distribution is no longer available for this data set. The NASA NSIDC DAAC now distributes data through HTTPS, which requires users to log in with an Earthdata Login username and password. Data will continue to be available free of charge.

Get Data


To learn more about Earthdata Login and register for an account, please see How to Register with Earthdata Login. Once you have logged in, data can be downloaded via a Web browser, command line, or client. For help with downloading data, please see Options Available for Bulk Downloading Data from HTTPS with Earthdata Login.


OGC Web Services: Access these data using the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) Services.
OGC Web Services: Access these data using the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) Services.
Search Database: Get data using a database search interface.
Data Set ID:

Antarctic 5-km Digital Elevation Model from ERS-1 Altimetry, Version 1

This data set provides a Digital Elevation Model (DEM) for Antarctica to 81.5 degrees south latitude, at a resolution of 5 km. Approximately twenty million data points were used to generate this data set. Data points were derived from ERS-1 radar altimetry during the geodetic phase from March 1994 to May 1995.

Geographic Coverage

  • Glaciers/Ice Sheets > Glacier Elevation/Ice Sheet Elevation
  • Glaciers/Ice Sheets > Glacier Topography/Ice Sheet Topography
  • Glaciers/Ice Sheets > Ice Sheets
  • Topography > Surface Roughness
  • Topography > Topographical Relief
Spatial Coverage:
  • N: -65, S: -81, E: 180, W: -180

Spatial Resolution:
  • 5
Temporal Coverage:
  • 1 March 1994 to 31 May 1995
Temporal Resolution: 1 day
Data Format(s):
  • ASCII Text
Platform(s) ERS-1, SATELLITES
Version: V1
Data Contributor(s): Jonathan Bamber, R. Layberry, S. Gogenini

Data Citation

As a condition of using these data, you must cite the use of this data set using the following citation. For more information, see our Use and Copyright Web page.

Bamber, J. 2000. Antarctic 5-km Digital Elevation Model from ERS-1 Altimetry, Version 1. [Indicate subset used]. Boulder, Colorado USA. NSIDC: National Snow and Ice Data Center. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5067/BZVCEDZWUTCH. [Date Accessed].

Back to Top

Collapse All / Open All

Detailed Data Description

This Digital Elevation Model (DEM) provides coverage of the Antarctic ice sheet to 81.5°S at 5 km resolution. Approximately 20,000,000 data points were used to generate this data set.  Data points were derived from ERS-1 radar altimetry during the geodetic phase from March 1994 to May 1995. DEM data are in a polar stereographic projection with the origin at the South Pole, and are referenced to the OSU91A geoid.

The improved density in coverage and resolution, compared with past satellite altimetry missions, provides better detection of topographic detail such as surface undulations, ice streams, grounding zones, and interstream ridges. Prior to the ERS-1 radar altimeter, researchers had very limited knowledge of the topography of Antarctica south of 72°S. The geodetic phase of ERS-1 provided coverage of the ice sheet to 81.5°S, with a higher density of data collection than previous satellite altimetry missions. When the DEM was gridded to 5 km resolution, it provided researchers with a more detailed observation of ice sheet flow characteristics and topography.

Radar altimetry data is generally used for studies of ice sheet mass balance and ice dynamics (direction and magnitude of ice flow). The 5 km resolution DEM for the Antarctic ice sheet provides detection of subtle topographic features including: surface undulations, flow lines, ice streams, interstream ridges, and grounding zones.


Data are provided in space-delimited ASCII text format.

Background color on
File and Directory Structure

Data are available on the HTTPS site in the https://daacdata/apps.nsidc.org/pub/DATASETS/BAMBER_DEM/ directory. Within this directory, there is one file: bamber.5km97.dat


Background color on
File Size

38720 KB

Background color on
Spatial Coverage

This data set contains surface elevations of the Antarctic ice sheet derived from ERS-1 from 65°S to 81.5°S. Antarctic Digital Database data filled the gap between 81.5°S to 90°S. Elevations in this region, along with areas of open ocean, are set to a fill value of 999.999.

Spatial Coverage Map

The dark circle in Figure 1 represents non-altimetric data from the Antarctic Digital Database used to fill in the area between 81.5 and 90 degrees South latitude.

Figure 1. Spatial Coverage Map of Bamber DEM

Spatial Resolution

The data are gridded with a cell size of 5 km.


Data are in a polar stereographic projection with geodetic latitude and longitude coordinates. The origin is at the South Pole. The projection is referenced to the WGS84 ellipsoid with an equatorial radius of 6378.137 km and an eccentricity of 0.081819190843. The standard parallel is 71°S.

Grid Description

A Cartesian grid is centered on the South Pole, with grid dimensions of 1121 by 1121 pixels and a range of -2800 km to + 2800 km. The following table summarizes the locations of the centers of selected grid cells in the DEM:

Cell Column Row Line Latitude Longitude
Upper left 0 0 1255521 -54.6732 -44.999
Upper right 1120 0 1256641 -54.6726  45.000
Lower left 0 1120 1 -54.6738 -135.000
Lower right 1120 1120 1121 -54.6732  134.999
Center 560 560 628321 -89.9993  45.000
Background color on
Temporal Coverage

Data were derived from ERS-1 radar altimetry during the geodetic phase from March 1994 to May 1995.

Temporal Resolution

Data were collected daily from the ERS-1 satellite for 336 days.

Background color on
Parameter or Variable

The ERS-1 radar altimeter measures ice sheet elevation and backscatter over land ice.

Sample Data Record

Sample ASCII output from bamber.5km97.dat:

Lat Lon Elev Difference
-81.3404 138.867 2375.68 -44.24
-81.3102 138.639 2387.87 -44.17
-81.2799 138.412 2396.72 -44.07
-81.2495 138.187 2403.71 -43.96

Columns represent latitude, longitude, and elevation with reference to the OSU91A geoid. The last column is the difference between the OSU91A geoid and the WGS84 ellipsoid. A value of 999.999 represents a grid cell where interpolation was not possible.

Latitude and longitude are expressed in decimal degrees to two decimal places. Negative longitude values represent the Western Hemisphere, and negative latitude values represent the Southern Hemisphere.

Background color on

Software and Tools

Quality Assessment

Data Validation by Source

Data were validated by a validation procedure that uses surface elevation and backscatter coefficient data collected from an area larger than the antenna footprint. A surface is fitted to these data and used as input into an altimeter waveform simulator program. The output is a range estimate, which is compared with the actual altimeter range measurement. Slope-induced error is not considered at this point because it could potentially mask all other variables. The program also calculates surface elevation, an estimate of the relocated latitude and longitude coordinates, and a slope magnitude and direction. These data can be used to assess how well the processing sequence, including the slope correction algorithm, is performing. The magnitude of the difference between the two data sets depends primarily on how large the slope values are, and how accurately they are known. Limited in situ data sets were available for validating the surface DEM (Bamber, Ekholm, and Krabill 1998).

Measurement Error for Parameters

A lack of in situ data precludes an exact quantitative assessment of the improvement in accuracy of the 5 km DEM based on ground truth data, as compared with lower resolution DEMs (Bamber 1997). However, results were similar to those from the 10 km grid. For this particular grid surface, slopes less than 0.4° were estimated to have an accuracy better than 1.5 m. For surface slopes greater than 0.65°, height estimates from the altimeter become unreliable. This affects 10% of Antarctica, primarily near the ice margins. The precision for a single data point is ± 0.81 m. This value represents an average over all the different surface types. Accuracy ranges from 10.7 m at 65°S and a slope of 0.65°, to 1.4 m at 75°S and a slope of 0.1°. These errors are dominated by the height variability within each grid cell, rather than errors in the individual altimetric elevation estimates. In summary, the accuracy and noise level of the altimeter data is best over the ice shelves as they are the flattest regions in Antarctica (Bamber, Ekholm, and Krabill 1998, Bamber 1994).

Background color on

Data Acquisition and Processing

Theory of Measurements

Satellite radar altimeters measure the time it takes an electromagnetic signal to travel from the altimeter antenna to the ice sheet surface and back to the altimeter's receiver. This range measurement allows investigators to determine the satellite's height above the ice sheet. See the Sensor or Instrument Description section of this document for more information.

Corrections are applied to the range measurements to account for the fact that returns are different over ice than over the ocean. The correction for interpreting the data over ice is called "retracking," and is described in papers by Davis and Zwally (1993), and Zwally, et al. (1983).

Over sloping terrain, the radar altimeter measurement needs to be corrected because the return comes from a point not directly below the satellite, but to the uphill side. The elevation indicated by the return time in this case is higher than that directly below the satellite. The data are slope-corrected to reduce the errors, using the slope correction algorithm from Brenner et al. (1983).

Background color on
Data Acquisition Methods

In March 1995, ERS-1 was operating along two repeat cycles of 168 days, which were offset so that they were equivalent to a single 336 day cycle. This provided 8.3 km across-track spacing at the equator, 4 km spacing at 60°S, and 2 km spacing at 70°S. The along-track spacing of each altimeter height measurement is 335 m (Bamber and Bindschadler 1997).

Detailed coverage of the Antarctic ice sheet by the ERS-1 radar altimeter, compared with past satellite altimetry missions, has improved the accuracy of the corresponding DEM by ensuring coverage of marginal regions, reducing spacing between adjacent sub-satellite tracks (thus reducing slope-induced error), and reducing random errors in individual altimeter height measurements.

A quantitative assessment of DEM accuracy is difficult to determine due to the lack of in situ validation data from the Antarctic ice sheet. However, vertical and horizontal accuracy are known to have improved from earlier Antarctic DEMs. To improve the accuracy of elevation estimates, various corrections were applied to the data including: a range-estimate refinement procedure (waveform tracking), slope correction, data filtering, and removal of anomalous orbits (Bamber and Bindschadler 1997).

Background color on
Derivation Techniques and Algorithms

The following discussion applies to the interior Antarctic ice sheet to 81.5°S.

Waveform Retracking

The purpose of a waveform retracking algorithm is to calculate the difference between a tracking point derived by the onboard software and a known, fixed position on the leading edge of a waveform signal. The point on a waveform that corresponds to the point on the surface closest to the satellite typically does not provide a useful representation of the surface height. However, determining elevation at any other location presents a problem because facets (faces of topographic features) with different elevations result in the interpretation of complex leading edges. Waveform analysis over variable terrain is a complicated procedure which requires prior knowledge of surface properties. Threshold and beta (ß) parameter retracking algorithms were used because they were considered the best methods for estimating the elevation at specific points (Bamber 1994).

Slope Induced Error Correction

A relocation algorithm was used to locate the closest point to the satellite and calculate the correction necessary to determine the surface elevation at that point, using an estimate of the surface slope magnitude and direction. For each data point, the algorithm first extracts the appropriate slope correction values from a look-up table, and calculates the magnitude and direction of the slope based on the range to the satellite. The latitude and longitude of this point is then estimated. The algorithm also calculates an elevation correction to account for the measurement not being taken at the satellite's nadir. The revised surface elevation is calculated using the relocation method (Bamber 1994).

Processing Steps

To make these data more useful in comparative studies, or as a control for ice sheet data and to avoid the need for other Level 2 products, Bamber attempted to improve the accuracy of elevation estimates of variable topographic surfaces with minimal biases by using the following steps (Bamber 1994).

  1. A range-estimate refinement procedure (waveform tracking) was implemented using the offset center of gravity method for calculating the waveform amplitude, with a power threshold of 25 percent.

  2. Slope correction was applied using a variation of the relocation method (Bamber 1994).

  3. Data filtering techniques were implemented, including tests applied to the return-echo waveform shape, backscatter coefficient, and retracking correction value for each altimeter height estimate. Approximately 27 percent of the data were removed during this procedure.

  4. Anomalous orbits were removed, by comparing one track with another where they cross (cross-over analysis).

  5. Data were interpolated onto a 5 km grid, and a two-stage gridding procedure was employed with the following steps:

    • Production of a local distance-weighted means of x, y and z in the region of a grid point, producing a quasi-regular array of average height estimates.

    • A triangulation procedure to interpolate to the exact grid point locations and to extrapolate to grid points where no altimeter data were present (Bamber, Ekholm, and Krabill 1998).

Error Sources

The following discussion applies to the interior Antarctic ice sheet to 81.5°S.

Sources of Error

Errors in altimeter data can be introduced from several sources including geographically correlated orbit errors, errors in slope correction procedures, and non-uniform spatial sampling (Bamber, Ekholm, and Krabill 1998).

Limitations of the Data

Problems still remain with lack of high-density surface elevation estimates south of 81.5°S.

Background color on
Sensor or Instrument Description

A radar altimeter collects elevation signals from land and ocean surfaces. These data are used to determine topographical features. This data set uses a radar altimeter instrument on the ERS-1 Satellite that measures the distance from the satellite to the Earth's surface using a radar signal. The instrument transmits an electronic pulse in the microwave frequency to the Earth's surface. The microwave pulse reflects off the surface and returns to the sensor. Altitude is determined from the pulse travel time (from transmit to receive) and from the waveform of the returned pulse.

Sensor/Instrument Mission Objectives

The radar altimeter measures the altitude of the Earth's surface to determine ice sheet topography and small-scale ocean roughness.

Key Variables

Satellite orbit, tropospheric/ionospheric signals, and geoid model.

Scanning or Data Collection Concept/Principles of Operation

The radar altimeter sends electromagnetic pulses at a microwave frequency to a land or ocean surface, then detects the reflected signals. The waveform data are then transmitted to a ground receiving station.

Sensor Description

The two major subsystems of the radar altimeter are: A peak power (RF) section and a signal processor.

*GEOSAT Radar Altimeter

  • Type -- traveling wave tube
  • Peak power (RF) -- 20 Watts (minimum)
  • Power consumption -- 70 Watts
  • Type -- Dual conversion (500Mhz, 0h)
  • Automatic gain control -- 0 to 63 decibels (1-dec steps)
  • Type -- 1-m parabolic
  • Gain -- >37.6 decibels
  • Beamwidth -- 2.0 degrees
  • Signal processor -- 47 pounds
  • RF Section -- 144 pounds
Envelope (in)
  • RF section -- 41.25 (diameter) X 11.5 (height) = 15,369 cubic inches (-antenna)
  • Antenna -- 41.25 (diameter) X 19.125 (height) = 25,559 cubic inches (incl. feed)
  • Signal processor -- 20 (length) X 13.5 (width) X 10 (height) = 2700 cubic inches

*The GEOSAT and SEASAT radar altimeters share mechanical, thermal, and electrical interface characteristics.

Radar Altimeter Characteristics for Various Satellites

Satellite Frequency (Ghz) Bandwidth Wavelength (m) Range Resolution (m) Pulse Compression Wave Height
ERS-1 13.50 400.00 0.02 0.10 8000.00
ERS-2 13.50 0.02 0.1 58000.00 .13 m
Geos-3 13.90 80.00 0.02 0.50 30.00 ±25% (4-10 m)
GEOSAT 13.50 320.00 0.02 0.10 30000.00 ±10% (1-20 m)
GEOSAT Follow-On 13.50 0.02 0.018 58000.00 .035 m
SEASAT 13.50 320.00 0.02 0.10 1000.00 ± 10% (1-20 m)
Skylab 13.90 100.00 0.02 1.00 13.00 1-2 m
TOPEX/Poseidon 5.3&13.6 320.00 .0566*amp;.02205 0.03 58000.00 .13 m



The GEOSAT radar altimeter contained an on board calibration mode that was invoked twice daily to track waveform sample gain and attitude, wave height, automatic gain control, and height.

  • For waveform sample gain correction, the onboard tracker operated on a set of 60 waveform samples in the power spectrum outputs of a digital filter bank. Effects, such as in-band ripple and band-edge rolloff of anti-aliasing low-pass filters in the altimeter receiver were removed by individual waveform sample gain correction factors.

  • The correction processes of the attitude determination (and related corrections) started with computation of a voltage proportional to attitude (VATT) based on the amplitude of the last eight waveform samples.


MacArthur, John L., Paul C. Marth, Jr., and Joseph G. Wall. 1987. The Geosat radar altimeter. Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest 8(2): 176-81.

Moody, Thomas B. 1996. Radar altimetry, Internet home page, University of Texas at Austin, Texas. http://www.ae.utexas.edu/courses/ase389/sensors/alt/alt.html.

Background color on

References and Related Publications

Contacts and Acknowledgments

Jonathan L. Bamber
Bristol Glaciology Centre School of Geographical Sciences
University of Bristol
University Road Bristol, BS8 1SS United Kingdom

Document Information


15 August 2000


30 April 2004

No technical references available for this data set.
No FAQs or How Tos available for this data set.

Access complete Knowledge Base

Questions? Please contact:
NSIDC User Services
Phone: 1 303 492-6199
Email: nsidc@nsidc.org