This data set contains vegetation parameters as part of the Soil Moisture Experiment 2002 (SMEX02).
SMEX02 Watershed Vegetation Sampling Data, Walnut Creek, Iowa, Version 1
This is the most recent version of these data.
BASIC Level of Service
Data: Data integrity verified
Documentation: Key metadata and links to supporting documentation available
User Support: Assistance with data access and basic data usage
|
Geographic Coverage |
- If you are not currently logged in to Earthdata, you will be prompted to do so.
- You may register for an Earthdata Login if you do not have an account.
Once you have logged in, you will be able to click and download files via a Web browser. There are also options for downloading via a command line or client. For more detailed instructions, please see Options Available for Bulk Downloading Data from HTTPS with Earthdata Login.
As a condition of using these data, you must cite the use of this data set using the following citation. For more information, see our Use and Copyright Web page.
Anderson, M. 2003. SMEX02 Watershed Vegetation Sampling Data, Walnut Creek, Iowa, Version 1. [Indicate subset used]. Boulder, Colorado USA. NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center. doi: https://doi.org/10.5067/XCGVUPGKER17. [Date Accessed].Detailed Data Description
This part of the SMEX02 experiment focused on modeling soil moisture and surface fluxes during periods of rapid vegetation growth. It was important to fully and accurately quantify the temporal development and spatial variability of primary canopy characteristics. Correction for water contained in surface biomass is essential for deriving soil moisture estimates from remote microwave observations. Canopy height and cover information is also important for estimating surface roughness, soil-plant flux partitioning, and other parameters required for modeling land-atmosphere interactions. Four rounds of intensive sampling were conducted at the 31 soil moisture sampling sites within the Walnut Creek Watershed.
Land cover in the Walnut Creek Watershed consists of corn and soybean fields, with some forested areas in localized riparian zones. The vegetation sampling scheme for SMEX02 was designed to characterize variability in surface vegetation conditions within the watershed, given the range of landcover and soil types, crop planting dates, and cultivation techniques encountered in the Iowa landscape.
Data are provided as ASCII text files and as a Microsoft Excel file.
"smex02_wc_veg_site.txt" contains descriptions and coordinates of sampling locations.
"smex02_wc_veg_loc.txt" contains vegetation data averaged over rows at each sampling location.
"smex02_wc_veg_row.txt" contains vegetation data collected in each row, at each sampling location.
"smex02_wc_veg.xls" is an Excel file that contains the location-averaged data, row data, and data broken out by station.
File sizes range from 270 KB to 2.06 MB.
Total volume of the data files is 2.45 MB.
Southernmost Latitude: 41.7° N
Northernmost Latitude: 42.7° N
Westernmost Longitude: 93.8° W
Easternmost Longitude: 93.2° W
The study was conducted between 15 June and 9 July 2002. Actual sampling dates were 16, 17, 18, 19, 27, 28, 29, and 30 June, and 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 8 July 2002.
Parameter Description
The parameters are stand density, plant height, phenological stage, ground cover, green and dry biomass, row spacing, stem and leaf water content, and leaf area index (LAI).
The following table describes each column in the "smex02_wc_site.txt" data file.
Column heading | Description |
---|---|
Site | Watershed site location number (WC01, WC02, etc.) |
Loc | Sampling point for each site location 1=high vegetation cover, 2=low cover, 3=average cover |
Easting | UTM Easting in meters (Zone 15) |
Northing | UTM Northing in meters (Zone 15) |
Target_corner | The corner of the sampling location where the aerial target was installed |
Row_sp | Row spacing - the distance in meters between the center of one plant row to the center of the next plant row |
Row_dir | Direction of the row |
Crop | The type of crop growing - corn, soy |
The following table describes each column in the "smex02_wc_loc.txt" data file. Units of measure are given for parameters. (The flexcoil technique refers to a planting method that has no clear row structure.)
Column heading | Description | Unit of Measure |
---|---|---|
Site | Watershed site location number (WC01, WC02, etc.) | |
Crop | C=corn S=soy |
|
Loc | Sampling point for each site location 1=high vegetation cover, 2=low cover, 3=average cover |
|
Date CST | DD/MM/YYYY Central Standard Time | |
DOY CST | Numerical day of the year (Julian date) | |
Time CST | HHMM Central Standard Time | |
Row_sp m | Space between rows (Flex=flexcoil planting) | meters |
Row_dir | Row direction (NA=not applicable, flexcoil planting) | East, West, North, South |
AvgDensity pl/m2 | Average stand density | plants/m2 |
AvgHeight m | Average plant height over five plants | meters |
AvgGr_cover | Average ground cover | percentage |
AvgGBM_st g | Average stem green biomass | grams |
AvgGBM_lf g | Average leaf green biomass | grams |
AvgGBM_pl g | Average plant green biomass | grams |
AvgAGBM_st kg/m2 | Average stem green biomass | kg/m2 |
AvgAGBM_lf kg/m2 | Average leaf green biomass | kg/m2 |
Avg_AGBM_pl kg/m2 | Average plant green biomass | kg/m2 |
AvgWC_st g | Average stem water content | grams |
AvgWC_lf g | Average leaf water content | grams |
AvgWC_pl g | Average plant water content | grams |
AvgAWC_st kg/m2 | Average stem water content | kg/m2 |
AvgAWC_lf kg/m2 | Average leaf water content | kg/m2 |
AvgAWC_pl kg/m2 | Average plant water content | kg/m2 |
AvgLAI | Average LAI |
The following table describes each column in the "smex02_wc_row.txt" data file. Units of measure are given for parameters.
Column heading | Description | Unit of Measure |
---|---|---|
Site | Watershed site location number (WC01, WC02, etc.) | |
Crop | C=corn S=soy |
|
Loc | Sampling point for each site location 1=high vegetation cover, 2=low cover, 3=average cover |
|
Row | Row number | |
Date CST | DD/MM/YYYY Central Standard Time | |
DOY CST | Numerical day of the year (Julian date) | |
Time CST | HHMM Central Standard Time | |
Row_sp m | Row spacing - distance in meters between the center of one plant row to the center of the next plant row (Flex=flexcoil planting) | meters |
Row_dir | Row direction (NA=not applicable, flexcoil planting) | East, West, North, South |
Density pl/m2 | Stand density - number of plants in a meter length within a row | plants/m2 |
Height m | Plant height over five plants | meters |
Pheno | Average phenological stage of plants within the sampling rows (See the Iowa State corn phenological guide and the Iowa State soy phenological guide for stage designations) |
|
Gr_cover | Ground cover | percentage |
GBM_st g | Stem green biomass | grams |
GBM_lf g | Leaf green biomass | grams |
AvgGBM_pl g | Plant green biomass | grams |
AGBM_st kg/m2 | Areal stem green biomass | kg/m2 |
AGBM_lf kg/m2 | Areal leaf green biomass | kg/m2 |
AGBM_pl kg/m2 | Areal plant green biomass | kg/m2 |
WC_st g | Stem water content | grams |
WC_lf g | Leaf water content | grams |
WC_pl g | Plant water content | grams |
AWC_st kg/m2 | Areal stem water content | kg/m2 |
AWC_lf kg/m2 | Areal leaf water content | kg/m2 |
AWC_pl kg/m2 | Areal plant water content | kg/m2 |
LAI | LAI | |
Sky | Weather conditions | sun or shade |
Parameter Source
LAI is measured by a plant canopy analyzer. Other parameters were measured manually.
Sample Data Record
The following sample is taken from the "smex02_wc_site.txt" data file.
Site Loc Easting Northing Target_corner Row_sp Row_dir Crop - - m m - m - - WC01 1 437265.98 4646549.05 NE 0.76 E-W corn WC01 2 437256.94 4646703.58 NE 0.76 E-W corn WC01 3 437220.73 4646847.81 NE 0.76 E-W corn WC03 1 437728.68 4647902.96 SE 0.38 N-S soy
The next sample is taken from the "smex02_wc_row.txt" data file. Only the first 19 columns are represented in the sample.
Site Crop Loc Row Date DOY Time Row_sp Row_dir Density Height Pheno Gr_cover GBM_st GBM_lf GBM_pl AGBM_st AGBM_lf AGBM_pl ... - - - CST CST CST m - pl/m2 m - % g g g kg/m2 kg/ kg/m2 ... WC01 C 1 2 6/29/2002 180 820 0.76 E-W 6.56 1.52 v8 80 461.31 195.73 657.04 3.03 1.28 4.31 ... WC01 C 1 4 6/29/2002 180 820 0.76 E-W 7.87 1.55 v9 80 406.32 174.76 581.08 3.20 1.38 4.58 ... WC01 C 1 6 6/29/2002 180 820 0.76 E-W 7.22 1.46 v9 80 324.18 149.64 473.82 2.34 1.08 3.42 ... WC01 C 1 8 6/29/2002 180 820 0.76 E-W 7.22 1.49 v8 80 392.21 169.69 561.90 2.83 1.22 4.06 ... WC01 C 1 10 6/29/2002 180 820 0.76 E-W 5.91 1.47 v8 80 369.57 175.63 545.20 2.18 1.04 3.22 ...
The next sample is taken from the "smex02_wc_loc.txt" data file. Only the first 16 columns are represented in the sample.
Site Crop Loc Date DOY Time Row_sp Row_dir AvgDensity AvgHeight AvgGr_cover AvgGBM_st AvgGBM_lf AvgGBM_pl AvgAGBM_st ... - - - CST CST CST m - pl/m2 m % g g g kg/m2 ... WC01 C 1 6/29/2002 180 820 0.76 E-W 6.96 1.50 80 390.72 173.09 563.81 2.72 ... WC01 C 2 6/29/2002 180 820 0.76 E-W 6.69 1.00 55 218.02 114.37 332.39 1.42 ... WC01 C 3 6/29/2002 180 820 0.76 E-W 8.53 1.32 70 290.52 172.51 463.03 2.47 ... WC01 C 1 7/6/2002 187 1100 0.76 E-W 8.40 2.09 90 481.76 220.00 701.75 4.04 ... WC01 C 2 7/6/2002 187 1100 0.76 E-W 8.53 1.53 70 394.28 164.13 558.42 3.38 ...
Software and Tools
In some data files, a misalignment between the sensor mask and the sun caused direct sunlight to enter the detector. In these cases, the LAI was recomputed excluding the offending sensor ring/location combination. All data were assessed and corrected for these errors. The data were also examined for evidence of variable sky conditions during the measurement sequence.
Phenology observations in later sampling rounds were corrected slightly for low leaves that had likely matured and fallen off and may have been disregarded in the phenological stage assessment. In corn, 3 leaves were added in Round 3 to plants in V stages. In Round 4, 5 leaves were added to plants in V stages, and capped at stage V18.
Data Acquisition and Processing
Vegetation data were collected in watershed soil moisture sampling sites during four rounds of sampling: the 12 watershed sites containing flux towers were sampled 4 times during the experiment; the remaining 19 sites were sampled twice. This sampling schedule allowed characterization of the rapid evolution in biomass and surface cover that occurred during the course of this study.
Three vegetation sampling locations were identified in each site using aerial imagery. One location with high vegetation cover, one with low cover, and a third with average cover (see Figure 1).

Figure 1. Schematic of vegetation sampling strategy
At the corner of each sampling location, a large white aerial target (1 m by 1 m) was stapled to the ground (see Figure 2). The locations of each target were recorded on the ground with handheld Global Positioning System (GPS) units.

Figure 2. Photograph of aerial target
Each sampling location was 10 rows across and 12 m long. Biomass samples, LAI, plant height, and stand density measurements were collected from every second row, yielding 5 sets of observations per location times 3 locations per field, which equals 15 data sets per field per sampling round. In the first sampling round, vegetation samples were collected in the first 3 m segment closest to the aerial target; in the second round, from the second 3 m segment, etc.
The purpose of vegetative sampling is to provide an estimate of the variation in the vegetative components in the corn and soybean fields across the SMEX02 study sites.
Stand Density
Stand density was measured by placing a meter stick along the row in each of the five rows sampled. The meter stick was placed at the center of a plant stem, with that stem counting as the first plant. All plants within the 1 m length were counted. If a plant was at the end of the meter stick and more than half of the stalk extended beyond the end of the meter stick, it was not counted.
For soybean fields planted with the flexcoil technique, which has no clear row structure (WC10 and WC14), a wire frame with dimensions 1 m by 0.5 m was used to measure stand density. The frame was placed on the soil surface and all plants within the frame were counted.
Vegetation Height
Samplers used a meter stick, to estimate the average height of the canopy within a 3 m segment in each sampling row. In corn, this nominal height estimate excluded the extreme tips of vertical leaves.
Ground Cover
Samplers assessed percentage ground cover as the fraction of the spacing between rows that the crop canopy occupied. For example, if a soybean row were visualized as a cylinder, ground cover would be the ratio between the diameter of the cylinder and the row spacing.
Green and Dry Biomass
Biomass samples were collected in each sampling row, yielding five plants sampled per location per sampling round. One plant of average height was cut at the ground surface from each sampling row and transported back to the lab for weighing.
Corn: Leaves and stalks were removed from each corn plant in the field and placed in separate paper bags. The samples were dropped off at the lab as quickly as possible.
Soybean: In the field, each whole plant was placed in a paper bag. Lab workers separated leaf and stem components at the lab.
At the lab, each paper bag was weighed and the green biomass and tare weight recorded. (Several empty bags were weighed to assess tare weights.) The filled bags were taken to drying ovens operated by the Iowa State University Agronomy Department and dried for 4-5 days at 110° F. Weights of representative corn samples were obtained periodically during the drying process to ascertain that weight loss had ceased before the samples were removed from the ovens. After drying, the dry biomass and tare weights were recorded.
Leaf Area Index (LAI)
Leaf Area Index was measured using an LAI-2000 (LiCor Inc.) canopy analyzer, which compares above- and below-canopy light levels to compute LAI and canopy architecture. The canopy analyzers were set to average four locations into a single value, using one observation taken above the canopy and four beneath the canopy: in the row, ¼ of the way across the row, ½ of the way across the row and ¾ of the way across the row. This gives a good spatial average for row crops of partial cover.
The manufacturer recommends using the LAI-2000 units only in diffuse light, in overcast conditions, or near dawn or dusk. Direct-beam radiation reflected into the sensor from upper leaves in the canopy can be confused with open sky, causing LAI to be underestimated. Because of restrictions in time and manpower, LAI observations in SMEX02 were taken in both sunlit and shaded/diffuse conditions. Observers were instructed to note local sky conditions that existed during each measurement. If no shadows could be seen during the measurement, then the measurement was marked "shade." If shadows could be seen during the measurement then the measurement was marked "sun." If sky conditions changed during the course of a measurement, the measurement was not used. A series of observations were taken in several fields to test the effect of sunlit vs. shaded conditions on derived LAI, and a simple analytical routine is being developed to correct observations that were acquired in sun. The effect appears to be a negative bias on the order of <0.5 units of LAI.
Biomass water content (BWC; g/plant) in plant stems and leaves was computed as:
where Bg' is the green biomass + tare weight and Bd' is the dry biomass plus tare weight. This assumes that water loss from the tares (paper bags) was negligible in comparison with that from the plant samples.
In row crops, stand density (ASD; plants/m2) was estimated from the row plant density (RD; plants/m) using:
where RS is the row spacing. In flexcoil plots, it was computed as
where AD is the plant density measured using the 1m by 0.5 m wire frame. Biomass water content (kg/m2) was then computed as:
References and Related Publications
Contacts and Acknowledgments
Martha Anderson
Assistant Scientist
Space Science and Engineering Center
University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Many graduate students and volunteers collected the field samples.
Document Information
DOCUMENT CREATION DATE
September 2003