This data set comprises a 50-year record of daily extratropical cyclone statistics computed for the Northern Hemisphere. Cyclone locations and characteristics were obtained by applying the updated Serreze (1997) algorithm to daily Sea Level Pressure (SLP) data at six-hour intervals (Serreze and Barrett 2008). The SLP source data are part of the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) and National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Reanalysis data set, an assimilation of various atmospheric data collected by a wide variety of sensors within a global weather model. The parameters included in this data set are the position and central pressure of each cyclone, the distance the center of the cyclone traveled, whether the observation represents a cyclogenesis or cyclolysis event, and the local Laplacian of SLP and Sea Level Pressure Tendency (SLPT) at each cyclone center. The total volume of this data set is approximately 150 megabytes. Data are provided in tab-delimited ASCII text format and are available via FTP.
As a condition of using these data, you must cite the use of this data set using the following citation. For more information, see our Use and Copyright Web page.
Serreze, M. C. 2009. Northern Hemisphere Cyclone Locations and Characteristics from NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis Data. Boulder, Colorado USA: National Snow and Ice Data Center. Digital media.
|Data format||ASCII text
|Spatial coverage and resolution||
Northern Hemisphere coverage with 250 km resolution
Southernmost Latitude: 0° N
Northernmost Latitude: 90° N
Westernmost Longitude: 180° W
Easternmost Longitude: 180° E
|Temporal coverage and resolution||01 January 1958 - 31 December 2008|
|Tools for accessing data||Any Web browser or text editor
|File naming convention||ncepstorms_1958_YYYY.txt|
|File size|| ~150 MB
Cyclone Central Pressure
Distance the Cyclone Center Traveled
Local Laplacian of Sea Level Pressure (SLP) at the Cyclone Center
Sea Level Pressure Tendency (SLPT) at the Cyclone Center
|Procedures for obtaining data||Data are available via FTP.|
Mark C. Serreze
National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC)
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES)
449 UCB, University of Colorado at Boulder
Boulder, Colorado 80309-0449 USA
NSIDC User Services
National Snow and Ice Data Center
CIRES, 449 UCB
University of Colorado
Boulder, CO 80309-0449 USA
phone: +1 303.492.6199
fax: +1 303.492.2468
form: Contact NSIDC User Services
This research was supported by National Science Foundation (NSF) grant ARC-0531302. The NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis data used as a basis for this data set were provided by the Physical Sciences Division (PSD) of the Earth System Research Laboratory (ESRL), a part of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in Boulder, Colorado USA.
Data are provided in a tab-delimited ASCII text file that contains cyclone locations and characteristics. Table 1 lists the column headings and data field descriptions for the file.
||--||Decimal day of year (1.00, 1.25, 1.75, 2.00...365.75...)|
|rec_num||--||Cyclone system record number|
|month||--||1- or 2-digit month|
|day||--||1- or 2-digit day|
|hour||--||1- or 2-digit hour (0, 6, 12, 18 = 0000, 0600, 1200, 1800 UTC)|
|num_daily_sys||--||Total number of daily cyclone systems|
|num_grid_pts||--||Number of grid points defining central pressure of a given system|
|prev_day_skip_flag||--||Flag to indicate if previous day(s) were skipped (1 = yes, 2 = no)|
|cent_pressure||hPa||Cyclone central pressure|
|laplacian||mPa/km-2||Local laplacian of pressure system (a measure of cyclone system intensity)|
|distance||m||Distance traveled from last observation (-999 indicates the previous day was skipped or this is a cyclogenesis event)|
|press_tend||hPa/6h||Pressure tendency from last observation (-999 indicates the previous day was skipped or this is a cyclogenesis event)|
|lat||degrees North||Latitude of system center|
|lon||degrees East||Longitude of system center|
|cyclogen_flag||--||Flag indicating cyclogenesis event (1 = yes, 2 = no)|
|cyclol_flag||--||Flag indicating cyclolysis event (1 = yes, 2 = no)|
|sys_nu||--||System number during given year|
Data are available on the FTP site
in the following directory:
The ASCII data file is named according to the following convention and as described in Table 2:
|ncep||National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP)|
|storms||Cyclone storm systems|
|1958||First 4-digit year of time series|
|YYYY||Last 4-digit year of time series|
|.txt||Indicates this is an ASCII text file|
The ASCII text file is approximately 150 megabytes.
Spatial coverage is the Northern Hemisphere.
Southernmost Latitude: 0° N
Northernmost Latitude: 90° N
Westernmost Longitude: 180° W
Easternmost Longitude: 180° E
The spatial resolution of this data set is 250 km.
Prior to identification of cyclone centers, the input SLP data were interpolated from the NCEP/NCAR 2.5° x 2.5° grid to a 250 x 250 km version of the NSIDC EASE-Grid (Armstrong and Brodzik 1995). This is a lower-resolution form of the same equal-area projection being used at NSIDC for re-gridding passive microwave satellite data. The interpolation (based on Cressman weights) is necessary for compatibility with the algorithm search logic for identifying system centers and also promotes flexibility when applying the algorithm to SLP fields other than the NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis. However, the interpolation has the undesirable effect of smoothing the fields.
Temporal coverage for this data set spans 01 January 1958 to 31 December 2008. Data were subsetted from the NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis time series which provides global coverage from 1948 to the present. Due to fewer upper-air data observations made during the first decade of the time series, only data from 1958 to 2008 have been used for this data set (Kistler et al. 2001).
For the purposes of this data set, data originating from the NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis time series were analyzed four times per day at six-hour intervals.
Parameters include the position and central pressure of each cyclone, the distance the center of the cyclone traveled, whether the observation represents a cyclogenesis or cyclolysis event, the local Laplacian of the SLP at each cyclone center, and the SLPT at each cyclone center.
The cyclone position, or cyclone system center, is provided in latitude and longitude coordinates, and the cyclone central pressure is provided in hectopascals (hPa). The distance each cyclone center traveled is provided in kilometers. Cyclogenesis and cyclolysis represent the first and last appearance of a closed 1-hPa isobar, respectively.
The following text from Serreze et al. 1997 describes the local Laplacian and SLPT parameters:
The local Laplacian parameter is proportional to the geostrophic relative vorticity and, unlike cyclone central pressure, provides an index of cyclone intensity largely independent of changes in the background pressure field (Murray and Simmonds 1991). In turn, SLPT provides a useful index of synoptic development (Sanders and Gyakum 1980), provided that the decrease in cyclone central pressure is not embedded within a region of generally falling or rising pressure and the storm maintains an approximately constant size through the 6-hr analysis period (Roebber 1989). Following Roebber (1984), all SLPT values were adjusted by latitude using the relationship in Equation 1:
|SLPTadj = SLPT sin Φref/sin Φ||Equation 1|
where Φref is a reference latitude of 60° N and Φ is the latitude of the SLPT observation. This accounts for the latitudinal variation in geostrophic wind for a unit pressure gradient. The choice of the reference latitude is arbitrary; 60° N was chosen here following Sanders and Gyakum (1980) and Serreze (1995). (Serreze et al. 1997)
Table 3 provides a brief description and the units of each parameter.
|Cyclone Position||Latitude and longitude of cyclone system center||degrees|
|Cyclone Central Pressure||Pressure at the center of the cyclone system||hPa|
|Distance Cyclone Center Traveled||Distance the cyclone center traveled since it was initially tracked||km|
|Cyclogenesis/Cyclolysis||Cyclogenesis and cyclolysis represents the first and last appearance of a closed 1-hPa isobar, respectively||--|
|Local Laplacian of SLP||A measure of intensity of sea level pressure at the cyclone center||mPa/km-2|
|SLPT||Sea level pressure tendency at each cyclone center, as determined between subsequent central pressure values||hPa (6 h)−1|
Figure 1 displays a partial sample of the ncepstorms_1958_2008.txt file.
The NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis time series data were used as source data to derive this data set. For a list of errors with the NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis data, visit the NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis Problems List Web page.
Serreze and Barrett (2008) oultine several screening steps that users of this data set may wish to consider. These include discarding cyclones that remained stationary during their system life cycle, such as remained within the same grid cell, and discarding cyclones that lasted less than one day and thus comprised less than four 6-hr charts. As most spurious systems appear due to a reduction in surface pressure to sea level over high or complex topography, these screening steps eliminated those systems. These screening steps also tended to eliminate most mesoscale features, such as those in the range of 10 to 1000 kilometers.
Another potentially useful screening is to verify that a cyclone had deepened sometime during its life cycle. Serreze and Barrett (2008) retained only cyclones with a minimum total of 2 hPa SLP change over their life cycle. Though these steps helped limit analysis to most robust cyclone systems, some spurious systems may still remain, particularly over Greenland. (Serreze and Barrett 2008)
Data are available via FTP.
The total volume of this data set is approximately 150 megabytes.
The ASCII text file may be viewed using any text editor or Web browser.
Prior to the early 1950s, prevailing views of the Arctic atmospheric circulation remained largely speculative. Interest in the Arctic atmospheric circulation stems from recognition of the importance of atmospheric variability in driving anomalies in the circulation, extent, concentration, and thickness of the sea ice cover (Walsh and Chapman 1990). Such anomalies, through atmospheric feedbacks, may have potentially significant impacts on regional and hemispheric climates. In light of this interest, this data set provides Arctic cyclone characteristics based on results from an automated cyclone detection and tracking algorithm applied to a 50-year record (1958-2008) of daily NCEP/NCAR reanalysis of sea level pressure.
The NCEP [formerly the National Meteorological Center (NMC)]/NCAR Reanalysis source data includes an assimilation of land surface, rawinsonde, ship, pibal, aircraft, satellite, and various other data within a global weather model. A partial list of some of the sensors and data sources used in the NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis is provided in Table 4. For complete documentation regarding the sensors used as a basis for this data set, refer to the NCEP-NCAR 50-Year Reanalysis: Monthly Means CD-ROM and Documentation paper.
|Example Data Type||Example Data Source and/or Sensor(s)||Description|
|Rawinsonde||NCEP Global Telecommunication System (GTS) data||The main source for the rawinsonde data, a global collection of upper-air observation data. Also includes pibal and aircraft data.|
|Surface Marine Data||Comprehensive Ocean-Atmosphere Data Set (COADS) data||Among other data, includes data from ships, drifting buoys, fixed buoys, pack-ice buoys, and near-surface data from ocean station reports, such as Expendable Bathythermographs (XBTs).|
|Aircraft Data||NCEP Global Telecommunication System (GTS) data||The main source for the aircraft data, a global collection of upper-air observation data. Also includes pibal and rawinsonde data.|
|Surface Land Synoptic Data||Air Force Global Telecommunication System (GTS) data||The main source for the surface land synoptic data, a global collection of surface data.|
|Satellite Sounder Data||TIROS Operational Vertical Sounder (TOVS) sensors:
High Resolution Infrared Radiation Sounder (HIRS)
Microwave Sounding Unit (MSU)
Stratospheric Sounding Unit (SSU)
|The TOVS suite of sensors provides global measurements used in weather forecasting, such as the vertical distribution of temperature and moisture in the atmosphere.|
|Surface Wind Speed Data||Special Sensor Microwave Imager (SSM/I)||SSM/I data were used with the Krasnopolsky et al. (1995) algorithm which resulted in wind speeds closer to buoy data, and coverage under cloudy conditions. Measurements include SSM/I wind speed, total precipitable water, and other parameters. (Kalnay et al. 1996)|
|Satellite Cloud Drift Wind Data||Geostationary Meteorological Satellite (GMS) data||The GMS program is a series of satellites operated by the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA). The Visible and Infrared Spin Scan Radiometer (VISSR), the primary instrument aboard GMS, collects visible and infrared images of Earth and its cloud cover.|
NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis source data were acquired from the Physical Sciences Division (PSD) of the Earth System Research Laboratory (ESRL), a part of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in Boulder, Colorado USA. For access to the original source data, visit the NOAA ESRL Reanalysis Datasets at PSD Web page.
The NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis time series data were used as source data to derive this data set. The NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis source data set includes an assimilation of land surface, rawinsonde, ship, pibal, aircraft, satellite, and various other data within a global weather model. For complete documentation regarding the sensors, platforms, and methods used as a basis for this data set, refer to the NCEP-NCAR 50-Year Reanalysis: Monthly Means CD-ROM and Documentation paper.
The following is adapted from Serreze et al. 1997.
The current detection and tracking algorithm is largely identical to that of Serreze (1997). The two major components of the algorithm are:
Cyclones are identified using a series of search patterns, testing whether a grid point SLP value is surrounded by grid point values at least 1 hPa higher than the central point being tested. Starting on the first 6-hr chart (Chart 1), each cyclone is ascribed a number. A grid array is then centered over each system on the next 6-hr chart (Chart 2). If a cyclone on Chart 1 falls within a given array, the Chart 2 cyclone at the center of the array is taken to be a continuation of the Chart 1 system. This immediately tracks stationary or slow-moving cyclones. It is possible that two or more Chart 1 systems could fall within the same array, but this was rarely observed. The minimum distances from all remaining untracked systems on Chart 2 are then determined with respect to the remaining numbered systems on Chart 1. Typically, two or more untracked Chart 2 systems have their minimum distance with respect to the same Chart 1 system. The number of the Chart 1 system is carried over to the closest Chart 2 system, provided that the minimum distance between them is less than a specified limit, and several other screening steps involving the 6-hr SLPT at the cyclone centers for a candidate pairing and the direction of system motion are satisfied. Otherwise, the Chart 2 system is taken as new (cyclogenesis), and successively more distant Chart 2 systems are tested in the same manner, up to the distance limit. At the end of the search process, all remaining Chart 1 systems that could not be paired with a Chart 2 system are considered to have filled (cyclolysis). The process is then repeated for each subsequent pair of charts. If any chart is missing, all systems on the next available chart are taken as new and numbered accordingly. (Serreze et al. 1997)
A Fortran program was used to apply an algorithm that identifies and tracks cyclones using gridded SLP analyses as a basis. Each cyclone identified is ascribed a unique number which is maintained throughout the life history of the system from cyclogenesis to cyclolysis. The output variables include the following: the position of each cyclone; the cyclone number, year, month, day, and hour of each observation; cyclone central pressure; the local Laplacian of SLP at the cyclone center (a measure of intensity); pressure tendency (as determined between subsequent central pressure values); and whether the system represents a cyclogenesis or cyclolysis event, based on the first and last observation. All cyclone numbers are reset at 01 January 0000Z of each year, where Z indicates Zulu Time Zone/UTC. The program was originally developed by Mark Serreze at the University of Colorado for application to 12-hr NMC fields for the entire Northern Hemisphere. The present version was subsequently modified for application to 6-hr Northern Hemisphere fields from the NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis data set. The logic of the algorithm is further explained in Serreze 1997.
Prior to identification of cyclone centers, the input NCEP/NCAR SLP arrays are interpolated to a 250 x 250 km version of the NSIDC EASE-Grid (Armstrong and Brodzik 1995). This is a lower-resolution form of the same equal-area projection being used at NSIDC for re-gridding passive microwave satellite data. The interpolation (based on Cressman weights) is necessary for compatibility with the algorithm search logic for identifying system centers and also promotes flexibility when applying the algorithm to SLP fields other than the NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis. Of course, the interpolation has the undesirable effect of smoothing the fields, but it avoids the problem of strong convergence of meridians at high latitudes.
The distance and pressure tendency thresholds for cyclone tracking were altered for use with 6-hr as opposed to 12-hr analyses. The parameter sets work well with the NCEP/NCAR analyses, but would need to be adjusted for use with other SLP fields. The most important threshold is set by the variable maxdist. For the NCEP/NCAR data used here, it is set to 800 km, meaning that the total allowable distance a cyclone can move between six-hour intervals is 800 km (133 km/hr). While seemingly too fast (a speed of 100 km is about the upper limit one could ever imagine for cyclone motion), this allows for center jumps to be tracked. Further, since data are only at specific grid points, there are only a finite number of possible distances a cyclone can move (the distances are quantized). The maxdist and other distance thresholds were adjusted to account for this; and, as noted in the Quality Assessment section of this document, the user may wish to screen the data to eliminate short-lived and/or spurious cyclone systems.
Kalnay, E., M. Kanamitsu, R. Kistler, W. Collins, D. Deaven, L. Gandin, M. Iredell, S. Saha, G. White, J. Woollen, Y. Zhu, A. Leetmaa, R. Reynolds, M. Chelliah, W. Ebisuzaki, W. Higgins, J. Janowiak, K. Mo, C. Ropelewski, J. Wang, R. Jenne, and D. Joseph. 1996. The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 77, 437–471.
Kistler, R., E. Kalnay, W. Collins, S. Saha, G. White, J. Woollen, M. Chelliah, W. Ebisuzaki, M. Kanamitsu, V. Kousky, H. van den Dool, R. Jenne, and M. Fiorino. 2001. The NCEP-NCAR 50-Year Reanalysis: Monthly Means CD-ROM and Documentation. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 82, 247-268. doi: 10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082<0247:TNNYRM>2.3.CO;2.
Krasnopolsky, V. M., L. C. Breaker, and W. H. Gemmill. 1995. A Neural Network as a Nonlinear Transfer Function Model for Retrieving Surface Wind Speeds from the Special Sensor Microwave Imager. Journal of Geophysical Research, 100(C6), 11,033–11,045. PDF
Serreze, M. C., A. H. Lynch, and M. P. Clark. 2001. The Arctic Frontal Zone as Seen in the NCEP–NCAR Reanalysis. Journal of Climate, 14, 1550–1567. doi: <1550:TAFZAS>2.0.CO;2.
Serreze, M. C., F. Carse, R. G. Barry, and J. C. Rogers. 1997. Icelandic Low Cyclone Activity: Climatological Features, Linkages with the NAO, and Relationships with Recent Changes in the Northern Hemisphere Circulation. Journal of Climate, 10, 453–464. doi: 10.1175/1520-0442(1997)010<0453:ILCACF>2.0.CO;2.
Serreze, M. C. 1995. Climatological Aspects of Cyclone Development and Decay in the Arctic. ATMOSPHERIC-OCEAN 33 (1), 1-23. PDF
Tsukernik, M., D.
N. Kindig, and M. C. Serreze. 2007. Characteristics of Winter Cyclone Activity
in the Northern North Atlantic: Insights from Observations and Regional Modeling. Journal
of Geophysical Research 112(d3):
The acronyms used in this document are listed in Table 5.
|ARC||Arctic Sciences Division|
|ASCII||American Standard Code for Information Interchange|
|FTP||File Transfer Protocol|
|CIRES||Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences|
|COADS||Comprehensive Ocean-Atmosphere Data Set|
|DAAC||Distributed Active Archive Center|
|EASE-Grid||Equal Area Scalable Earth-Grid|
|ESRL||Earth System Research Laboratory|
|GMS||Geostationary Meteorological Satellite|
|GTS||Global Telecommunication System|
|HIRS||High Resolution Infrared Radiation Sounder|
|JMA||Japan Meteorological Agency|
|MSU||Microwave Sounding Unit|
|NCAR||National Center for Atmospheric Research|
|NCEP||National Centers for Environmental Prediction|
|NMC||National Meteorological Center|
|NOAA||National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration|
|NSF||National Science Foundation|
|NSIDC||National Snow and Ice Data Center|
|PSD||Physical Sciences Division|
|SLP||Sea Level Pressure|
|SLPT||Sea Level Pressure Tendency|
|SSM/I||Special Sensor Microwave Imager|
|SSU||Stratospheric Sounding Unit|
|TIROS||Television Infrared Observation Satellite|
|TOVS||TIROS Operational Vertical Sounder|
|UCAR||University Corporation for Atmospheric Research|
|URL||Uniform Resource Locator|
|UTC||Coordinated Universal Time|
|VISSR||Visible and Infrared Spin Scan Radiometer|