This data set consists of snow pit data from nine study areas, within three larger-scale areas in northern Colorado (Fraser, North Park, and Rabbit Ears Meso-cell study Areas (MSAs)). The study areas range from low-relief (flat topography) unforested areas with shallow snow covers, to high-relief (complex topography) densely forested areas with deep snow covers. Parameters measured include snow density, snow temperature, snow stratigraphy, and snow grain size. Data were collected during February and March 2002 and 2003. This data set is part of the NASA Cold Land Processes Field Experiment (CLPX).
The NASA CLPX is a multi-sensor, multi-scale experiment that focuses on extending a local-scale understanding of water fluxes, storage, and transformations to regional and global scales. Within a framework of nested study areas in the central Rocky Mountains of the western United States, ranging from 1-ha to 160,000 km2, intensive ground, airborne, and spaceborne observations are collected. Data collection focuses on two seasons: mid-winter, when conditions are generally frozen and dry, and early spring, a transitional period when both frozen and thawed, dry and wet conditions are widespread.
Cline, D., R. Armstrong, R. Davis, K. Elder, and G. Liston. 2002, Updated July 2004. CLPX-Ground: ISA Snow Pit Measurements, Version 2.0, [list the dates of the data used]. Edited by M. Parsons and M. J. Brodzik. Boulder, CO: National Snow and Ice Data Center. [access date] http://dx.doi.org/10.5060/D4H41PBP.
Category Description Data format Comma-separated ASCII files and shapefiles Spatial coverage Fraser, North Park, and Rabbit Ears MSAs in northern Colorado, US Temporal coverage and resolution 19-24 February and 25-30 March 2002
20-25 February and 26-31 March 2003File size ASCII file sizes range from 20 to 300 KB. shapefile sizes range from 1 to 8 MB.
Parameter(s) Snow Density
Snow Temperature
Snow Stratigraphy
Snow Grain Size
Snow Water EquivalentData access Data are available via FTP
1. Contacts
2. Detailed Data Description
Format3. Data Access and Tools
File and Directory Structure
File Naming Convention
File Size
Spatial Coverage
Temporal Coverage
Parameters
Quality Assessment
4. Data Acquisition and Processing
5. References and Related Publications
6. Document Information
Kelly Elder
Research Hydrologist
Rocky Mountain Research Station
USDA Forest Service
240 W. Prospect Road
Fort Collins, CO USA 80526
NSIDC User Services
National Snow and Ice Data Center
CIRES, 449 UCB
University of Colorado
Boulder, CO 80309-0449 USA
phone: +1 303.492.6199
fax: +1 303.492.2468
form: Contact NSIDC User Services
e-mail: nsidc@nsidc.org
Snow pit data are available in comma-separated ASCII text files, with a file extension of .csv, and in shapefile spatial data format shapefiles, with various extensions. There are four types of files: summary, density profile, temperature, and stratigraphy. shapefiles contain everything included in the text files, except for general pit comments, which were too verbose for import into shape format.
During all Intensive Study Periods (IOPs), extra pits were dug across the entire North Park MSA, to coincide with simultaneous airborne gamma measurements. These pits have non-standard pit IDs.
Missing data in the ASCII files are identified by "-999". Double quotes are used to delimit text within fields, and commas contained within the double quotes do not indicate a new field. In the shapefiles, missing dates are designated 9999-99-99, missing text fields are designated "NoData", and missing numeric fields are designated -999.
For detailed information about snow pit data format, please see the CLPX Snow Pit Measurements documentation.
Data are organized in the following structure:
pit_iop_v2.tgz
photos/
iop1/
alpine/
other/
roughness/
terrain/
buffalo_pass/
fool_creek/
gamma/
illinois_river/
michigan_river/
potter_creek/
spring_creek/
st_louis_creek/
iop2/
alpine/
other/
roughness/
templates/
terrain/
buffalo_pass/
fool_creek/
illinois_river/
michigan_river/
no_isa/
potter_creek/
spring_creek/
st_louis_creek/
walton_creek/
iop3/
alpine/
other/
pitwall/
roughness/
terrain/
buffalo_pass/
fool_creek/
illinois_river/
michigan_river/
potter_creek/
spring_creek/
st_louis_creek/
iop4/
The compressed (tarred and zipped) file "pit_iop_v2.tgz" will extract into two directories: ascii/ contains the .csv version of the data, and shape_files/ contains the GIS-compatible shapefiles. The shapefiles are organized as:
pit_iop_v#_density.dbf (and .prj, .sbn, .sbx, .shp, .shx)
pit_iop_v#_strat.dbf (and .prj, .sbn, .sbx, .shp, .shx)
pit_iop_v#_summary.dbf (and .prj, .sbn, .sbx, .shp, .shx)
pit_iop_v#_temperature.dbf (and .prj, .sbn, .sbx, .shp, .shx)
Please see the "Data Set Version History" section of the CLPX Snow Pit Measurements document for information about the latest version release (v#).
Snow pit filenames are named pit_GROUP_v#_DATA.csv, where:
pit indicates snow pit data
GROUP = pit group (iop1, iop2, iop3, iop4)
v# = Data release number (e.g., version 2)
DATA = type of data in the file: "summary," "density," "temperature," or "strat"
.csv = comma-separated value text file
shapefile names are pit_GROUP_v#_DATA.ext, where:
pit = indicates snow pit data
GROUP = pit group (iop)
note that all IOP pits are included in a single shape file
v# = Data release number (e.g., version 2)
DATA = type of data in the file: "summary," "density," "temperature," or "strat"
.ext = shape file extenstions {.dbf, .prj, .sbn, .sbx, .shp, .shx}
Please see the "Data Set Version History" section of the CLPX Snow Pit Measurements document for information about the latest version release.
The following codes are used in filenames (and for site names in the raw data):
MSA Code
F = Fraser
N = North Park
R = Rabbit Ears
ISA Code
A = Alpine
B = Buffalo Pass
F = Fool Creek
I = Illinois River
M = Michigan River
P = Potter Creek
S = Spring Creek (if MSA Code = R) or
St. Louis Creek (if MSA Code = F)
W = Walton Creek
ISA Sector
A = Lower Left Quadrant - SW
B = Upper Left Quadrant - NW
C = Upper Right Quadrant - NE
D = Lower Right Quadrant - SE
ASCII file sizes range from 20 to 300 KB. shapefile sizes range from 1 to 8 MB.
Fraser, North Park, and Rabbit Ears MSAs in northern Colorado, USA.
Schematic diagram of the nested study areas for the CPLX
Study area map
Location of MSAs
Location and characteristics of ISAs
IOP1 Snow Pits Measured:
MSA Planned number of pits Actual number of pits Fraser 48 47 LSOS (18 pits) 0 0 North Park 48 48 plus 118 "gamma" pits Rabbit Ears 48 48
IOP2 Snow Pits Measured:
MSA Planned number of pits Actual number of pits Fraser 48 48 LSOS (18 pits) 0 0 North Park 48 48 plus 160 "gamma" pits Rabbit Ears 48 48
IOP3 Snow Pits Measured:
MSA Planned number of pits Actual number of pits Fraser 48 48 North Park 48 48 plus 92 "gamma" pits Rabbit Ears 48 18
IOP4 Snow Pits Measured:
MSA Planned number of pits Actual number of pits Fraser 48 48 North Park 48 48 plus 43 "gamma" pits Rabbit Ears 48 44
IOP1 took place 19-24 February 2002.
IOP2 took place 25-30 March 2002.
IOP3 took place 20-25 February 2003.
IOP4 took place 26-31 March 2003.
Because of the general lack of snow in North Park, all pit data were collected on the first day of ground observations. The second day, teams collected pits at sites across the entire MSA to coincide with the gamma overflights.
Parameters include snow density, snow temperature, snow stratigraphy, snow grain size, snow water equivalent, snow wetness, surface roughness, and various averages and statistics.
For a complete description of parameters and measurements, please refer to the Measurements section of the CLPX Plan at http://www.nohrsc.nws.gov/~cline/clp/field_exp/clpx_plan/chapters/CLPX_plan_chap4.htm
The pit data were collected with the strictest levels of quality control, including QC performed in the field, usually within a day of the measurement (this includes the so-called "gamma pits" taken along roadsides in North Park, to coincide with simulataneous airborne gamma overflights).
Sources of measurement error in the snow pit density data include debris/vegetative matter embedded in the snow pit wall, particularly at or near the bottom of the snow pit, and the practice of "carrying down" the last measured density to the bottom of the pit, when the density cutter could not be used for the lowest measurements. This usually affected the last 10 cm or so, but could affect more, and is indicated in the density profile records with QC code "001". Surveyors did their best to avoid debris in the density cutters, but this situation was not always avoidable, and, where possible, was noted in the surveyors' comments.
Detailed Explanations of Snow Pit QC Codes:
In general:
codes from are reserved for QC performed on
---------- --------------------------------
001-099 snow density measurements
100-199 snow mass measurements ("shallow" pits)
200-299 snow temperature measurements
300-399 snow stratigraphy measurements
400-899 unused
900-999 general pit information, i.e. header values
Code Description (what was reset/set/estimated: the reason why)
---- ----------------------------------------------------------
000 QC OK: all tests passed
001 Density value estimated: Surveyor did not measure densities to the ground.
002 Density value calculated from sipre mass: Surveyor used sipre tube instead of density cutter.
003 Reset recorded layer top heights: recorded layer overlapped with layer above.
004 Interpolated layer density: gap in recorded densities.
005 Surveyor entered trace, will be treated as measurement of 0.
105 Surveyor entered trace, will be treated as measurement of 0.
301 Reordered grain sizes from LargeMedSmall: Relative grain sizes appeared out of expected order.
302 Reordered grain sizes from LargeSmallMed: Relative grain sizes appeared out of expected order.
303 Reordered grain sizes from MedSmallLarge: Relative grain sizes appeared out of expected order.
304 Reordered grain sizes from MedLargeSmall: Relative grain sizes appeared out of expected order.
305 Reordered grain sizes from SmallLargeMed: Relative grain sizes appeared out of expected order.
310 Reordered grain dimensions from LongShort: Relative dimensions appeared out of expected order.
311 Reordered grain dims/sizes from LongShort and LargeMedSmall: Relative grains appeared out of expected order.
312 Reordered grain dims/sizes from LongShort and LargeSmallMed: Relative grains appeared out of expected order.
313 Reordered grain dims/sizes from LongShort and MedSmallLarge: Relative grains appeared out of expected order.
314 Reordered grain dims/sizes from LongShort and MedLargeSmall: Relative grains appeared out of expected order.
315 Reordered grain dims/sizes from LongShort and SmallLargeMed: Relative grains appeared out of expected order.
320 Grain dims/sizes are ambiguous.
901 Snow pit depth estimated from first density measurement: Surveyor did not enter pit depth.
902 Snow pit depth estimated from mass measurement depths: Surveyor did not enter pit depth.
903 Snow pit depth estimated from first stratigraphy depth: Surveyor did not enter pit depth.
904 Snow pit depth set to 0: Surveyor did not enter pit depth, no snow measurement taken, but soil samples taken.
905 Warning: Snow pit depth does not match top of density profile.
906 Warning: Snow pit depth does not match top of temperature profile.
907 Warning: Snow pit depth does not match top of stratigraphy profile.
914 Canopy reset to missing value: Snow depth is 0.
915 Surface roughness reset to n: Snow depth is 0.
916 Surface wetness reset to missing value: Snow depth is 0.
917 Canopy height reset to missing value: Snow depth is 0.
950 Warning: Shallow pit form used, but pit depth > 15 cm.
951 Warning: Deep pit form used, but pit depth < 15 cm.
990 Warning: One or both UTM coordinates are missing.
991 Warning: Missing date and/or time field.
999 No data collected for this pit.
Detailed Explanations:
----------------------
000 QC OK: all tests passed
No problems were detected, values have not been changed from the
original forms.
Density QC codes
----------------
001 Density value estimated: Surveyor did not measure densities to the ground.
The density cutter was 10 cm high, so the final density profile
was generally not measured all the way to the ground, especially
in cases where vegetation was present. This density measurement
was estimated by carrying the last actual measurement to the
ground.
002 Density value calculated from sipre mass: Surveyor used sipre tube instead of density cutter.
In some cases, the surveyor used the density profile sheet
(normally used for density cutter measurements) to record SIPRE
tube (mass) measurments. The original measurement is assumed to
be a mass and has been used to calculate this density.
003 Reset recorded layer top heights: recorded layer overlapped with layer above.
The recorded density layer overlapped with the layer above it. In
order to assure non-overlapping measurements for pit average
density and SWE, the top height of this layer was reset to the
bottom height of the layer above it.
004 Interpolated layer density: gap in recorded densities.
There was a gap in the recorded density layers. In order to
assure a continuous set of density measurements for pit average
density and SWE, this layer was inserted, with a density
interpolated from the densities of the immediately surrounding
layers.
005 Surveyor entered trace, will be treated as measurement of 0.
During IOP3 and IOP4, snow on the ground that was not measurable
was recorded as a trace, and trace values were included in
calculated values as zeroes.
Mass QC codes
----------------------
105 Surveyor entered trace, will be treated as measurement of 0.
During IOP3 and IOP4, snow on the ground that was not measurable
was recorded as a trace, and trace values were included in
calculated values as zeroes.
Stratigraphy QC codes
----------------------
301 Reordered grain sizes from LargeMedSmall: Relative grain sizes appeared out of expected order.
The expected order of grain dimensions was short dimension Small,
Medium, Large followed by long dimension Small, Medium, Large.
However, when the QC software compared the areas (i.e. ShortSmall
times LongSmall, etc.) the original values in this stratigraphy
layer appeared to be reversed (Large, Medium, Small) and have been
reordered.
302 Reordered grain sizes from LargeSmallMed: Relative grain sizes appeared out of expected order.
The expected order of grain dimensions was short dimension Small,
Medium, Large followed by long dimension Small, Medium, Large.
However, when the QC software compared the areas (i.e. ShortSmall
times LongSmall, etc.) the original values in this stratigraphy
layer appeared to be out of order (Large, Small, Medium) and have
been reordered.
303 Reordered grain sizes from MedSmallLarge: Relative grain sizes appeared out of expected order.
The expected order of grain dimensions was short dimension Small,
Medium, Large followed by long dimension Small, Medium, Large.
However, when the QC software compared the areas (i.e. ShortSmall
times LongSmall, etc.) the original values in this stratigraphy
layer appeared to be out of order (Medium, Small, Large) and have
been reordered.
304 Reordered grain sizes from MedLargeSmall: Relative grain sizes appeared out of expected order.
The expected order of grain dimensions was short dimension Small,
Medium, Large followed by long dimension Small, Medium, Large.
However, when the QC software compared the areas (i.e. ShortSmall
times LongSmall, etc.) the original values in this stratigraphy
layer appeared to be out of order (Medium, Large, Small) and have
been reordered.
305 Reordered grain sizes from SmallLargeMed: Relative grain sizes appeared out of expected order.
The expected order of grain dimensions was short dimension Small,
Medium, Large followed by long dimension Small, Medium, Large.
However, when the QC software compared the areas (i.e. ShortSmall
times LongSmall, etc.) the original values in this stratigraphy
layer appeared to be out of order (Small, Large, Medium) and have
been reordered.
310 Reordered grain dimensions from LongShort: Relative dimensions appeared out of expected order.
The expected order of grain dimensions was 3 short dimensions
followed by 3 long dimensions, however, original values in this
stratigraphy layer appeared swapped, and have been reordered.
311 Reordered grain dims/sizes from LongShort and LargeMedSmall: Relative grains appeared out of expected order.
A combination of 301 and 310.
312 Reordered grain dims/sizes from LongShort and LargeSmallMed: Relative grains appeared out of expected order.
A combination of 302 and 310.
313 Reordered grain dims/sizes from LongShort and MedSmallLarge: Relative grains appeared out of expected order.
A combination of 303 and 310.
314 Reordered grain dims/sizes from LongShort and MedLargeSmall: Relative grains appeared out of expected order.
A combination of 304 and 310.
315 Reordered grain dims/sizes from LongShort and SmallLargeMed: Relative grains appeared out of expected order.
A combination of 305 and 310.
320 Grain dims/sizes are ambiguous.
The combination of dimensions and grain sizes was ambiguous.
These grain sizes were left in the order that they were recorded,
but should probably be treated with care before assuming dimension
and or size order.
Pit Summary (general mismatches across various fields) QC codes
---------------------------------------------------------------
901 Snow pit depth estimated from first density measurement: Surveyor did not enter pit depth.
The pit depth field on the original data sheet was left blank. It
has been estimated using the top height of the uppermost density
measurement.
902 Snow pit depth estimated from mass measurement depths: Surveyor did not enter pit depth.
The pit depth field on the original data sheet was left blank, and
there was no density or stratigraphy profile information. The pit
depth has been estimated using the maximum height of the mass
measurements taken.
903 Snow pit depth estimated from first stratigraphy depth: Surveyor did not enter pit depth.
The pit depth field on the original data sheet was left blank, and
there was no density profile information. The pit depth has been
estimated using the top height of the uppermost stratigraphy
measurement.
904 Snow pit depth set to 0: Surveyor did not enter pit depth, no snow measurement taken, but soil samples taken.
The pit depth field on the original data sheet was left blank, and
there was no density, temperature or stratigraphy profile
information, but soil samples were taken. The location is assumed
to have no snow, and depth has been set to 0.
905 Warning: Snow pit depth does not match top of density profile.
The pit depth value on the original data sheet is different from
the top height of the density profile.
906 Warning: Snow pit depth does not match top of temperature profile.
The pit depth value on the original data sheet is different from
the top height of the temperature profile.
907 Warning: Snow pit depth does not match top of stratigraphy profile.
The pit depth value on the original data sheet is different from
the top height of the stratigraphy profile.
914 Canopy reset to missing value: Snow depth is 0.
Measurement protocol was to record canopy only when snow depth was
greater than 0. In this case a recorded canopy was reset to
missing because the snow depth was 0.
915 Surface roughness reset to n: Snow depth is 0.
Measurement protocol was to take a surface roughness photo only
when snow depth was greater than 0. In this case a photo was
taken, but this field was reset to "n" (no) because the snow depth
was 0. The roughness photograph at this pit was not deleted,
however.
916 Surface wetness reset to missing value: Snow depth is 0.
Measurement protocol was to record surface wetness only when snow
depth was greater than 0. In this case a recorded surface wetness
was reset to missing because the snow depth was 0.
917 Canopy height reset to missing value: Snow depth is 0.
Canopy height field was introduced (in North Park only) during
IOP2. Measurement protocol was to record canopy height only when
snow depth was greater than 0. In this case a recorded canopy
height was reset to missing because the snow depth was 0.
950 Warning: Shallow pit form used, but pit depth > 15 cm.
Measurement protocol was to use the "shallow" pit form when the
snow depth was less than 15 cm.
951 Warning: Deep pit form used, but pit depth < 15 cm.
Measurement protocol was to use the "deep" pit form when the
snow depth was more than 15 cm.
990 Warning: One or both UTM coordinates are missing.
Pit coordinates are incomplete or missing.
991 Warning: Missing date and/or time field.
Date and/or time field are missing.
999 No data collected for this pit.
Data were not collected at this pit location, due to safety
hazard, weather conditions, or lack of time.
Snow pit data are available at ftp://sidads.colorado.edu/pub/DATASETS/CLP/data/ground_data/nsidc0176_snow_pits/.
For detailed information about snow pit data, please see the CLPX Snow Pit Measurements documentation.
Please see the References section of the CLPX Plan at http://www.nohrsc.nws.gov/~cline/clp/field_exp/clpx_plan/chapters/CLPX_plan_chap12.htm
ESRI
Shapefile Technical Description (http://www.esri.com/library/whitepapers/pdfs/shapefile.pdf)
15 August 2003
12 October 2005
http://nsidc.org/data/docs/daac/nsidc0176_clpx.gd.html